Bug 911172 - Creating mail server fails with EAP 6.1.0.DR4 if outbound-socket-binding-ref is not filled, but the UI doesn't force to fill this field
Summary: Creating mail server fails with EAP 6.1.0.DR4 if outbound-socket-binding-ref ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Operations Network
Classification: JBoss
Component: Plugin -- JBoss EAP 6
Version: JON 3.1.2
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ER01
: JON 3.2.0
Assignee: Thomas Segismont
QA Contact: Mike Foley
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-14 14:30 UTC by Radim Hatlapatka
Modified: 2014-01-02 20:39 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Radim Hatlapatka 2013-02-14 14:30:44 UTC
Description of problem:
When creating Mail Server (e.g. imap) then it fails with if outbound-socket-binding-ref is not filled:
JBAS014746: outbound-socket-binding-ref may not be null, rolled-back=true

But the field is not set as required in the UI.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: always


Steps to Reproduce:

1. start EAP 6.1.0.DR4 in standalone mode
2. Import it to JON
3. Under mail component create a new mail session (or use the default)
4. in the mail session via create new child try to create new mail server (it doesn't matter if imap, pop3 or smtp)
5. Leave outbound-socket-binding-ref as is (not specified) and finish the wizard

  
Actual results:

Mail server is not created and in child history in status of the operation is failed with error:
JBAS014746: outbound-socket-binding-ref may not be null, rolled-back=true


Expected results:

Either enforcing user to not be able to submit a request for mail server creation without specifying this field or not to require having this field filled (as was the behaviour in older versions)


Additional info:

Comment 1 Thomas Segismont 2013-02-18 11:15:48 UTC
IMO, we should force the field to be filled. Will discuss this with the team

Comment 2 Thomas Segismont 2013-02-19 11:50:49 UTC
Fixed in master: 7189891

Not sure where I should cherry-pick this one to.

Comment 3 Charles Crouch 2013-02-25 21:29:43 UTC
Setting this to MODIFIED as it will be available in the next build of JON320

Comment 4 Larry O'Leary 2013-09-06 14:31:45 UTC
As this is MODIFIED or ON_QA, setting milestone to ER1.

Comment 5 Jan Stefl 2013-09-26 12:53:18 UTC
JON 3.2 verified - OK


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.