Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 912786

Summary: Need to release note that some quickstarts ship with the beta version of Shrinkwrap resolver which is not supported
Product: [Retired] JBoss Enterprise WFK Platform 2 Reporter: sgilda
Component: doc-Release-NotesAssignee: WFK Docs Team <wfk-docs>
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED QA Contact: Karel Piwko <kpiwko>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: unspecifiedCC: mnovotny, ppenicka
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 2.2.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-01 07:30:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Email discussion around this issue. none

Description sgilda 2013-02-19 16:46:10 UTC 
Description of problem:

Some of the WFK quickstarts currently use the beta version of Shrinkwrap resolver. We ship it in the test code and pom.xml but it is not supported. We need to document this in the release notes.

The following is the current list of quickstarts that are impacted:

- deltaspike-beanbuilder
- deltaspike-deactivatable
- cdi-add-interceptor-binding
- kitchensink-deltaspike

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 sgilda 2013-02-19 21:51:31 UTC 
Created attachment 699690 [details]
Email discussion around this issue.

This is the email thread.
Comment 3 Karel Piwko 2013-03-01 07:30:15 UTC 
Closing as DEFERRED. There will be no ShrinkWrap Maven Resolver in the examples.
Comment 4 Petr Penicka 2013-03-22 14:26:50 UTC 
Clearing the requires_doc_text flag as we do not need a release note based on comment 3.