RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 913191 - Old selinux man page and missing some additional info about switching the policy
Summary: Old selinux man page and missing some additional info about switching the policy
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: man-pages-overrides
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Peter Schiffer
QA Contact: Iveta Wiedermann
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 913184
Blocks: 1011145
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-20 15:54 UTC by Michal Trunecka
Modified: 2014-09-30 23:34 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: outdated selinux(8) man page Consequence: outdated documentation Fix: update selinux(8) man page Result: current documentation
Clone Of: 913184
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 22:56:02 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
selinux.8.patch (5.20 KB, patch)
2013-09-19 13:55 UTC, Peter Schiffer
no flags Details | Diff
selinux.8.patch (5.20 KB, patch)
2013-10-24 12:53 UTC, Peter Schiffer
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1695 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE man-pages-overrides bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:52:14 UTC

Description Michal Trunecka 2013-02-20 15:54:02 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #913184 +++

Description of problem:

There are a few pieces of information in the selinux man page (man selinux) that aren't true any more:

"At present, two kinds of SELinux policy exist: targeted and strict."

"It is anticipated in the future that other policies will be created (Multi-Level Security for  example)."


and I also miss some additional information about switching the policy there. There is only stated that I can switch policy by changing the SELINUXTYPE value in /etc/selinux/config, but there is no information about when this change actually happen. I belive it is necessary to reboot the machine, but that is not mentioned there. Since a lot of tools takes the policy type from the config file, the system is in somewhat inconsistent state right after editing the configuration.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

# rpm -qf /usr/share/man/man8/selinux.8.gz
libselinux-utils-2.1.13-3.el7.x86_64

Comment 2 Peter Schiffer 2013-09-19 13:55:22 UTC
Created attachment 799958 [details]
selinux.8.patch

Comment 8 Peter Schiffer 2013-10-24 12:53:10 UTC
Created attachment 815764 [details]
selinux.8.patch

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 22:56:02 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1695.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.