Bug 913200 - Review Request: python-testrepository - A repository of test results
Summary: Review Request: python-testrepository - A repository of test results
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Kashyap Chamarthy
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 908842 958344
Blocks: 962132
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-20 16:10 UTC by Pádraig Brady
Modified: 2014-11-14 12:47 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-14 02:34:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
kchamart: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pádraig Brady 2013-02-20 16:10:17 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.14-1.fc15.src.rpm
Description: Provides a database of test results which can be used to                        
support easy developer workflows, supporting functionality                      
like isolating failing tests. Testrepository is compatible                      
with any test suite that can output subunit. This includes any                  
TAP test suite and any pyunit compatible test suite.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

Comment 1 Pádraig Brady 2013-05-18 05:22:08 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Provides a database of test results which can be used to                        
support easy developer workflows, supporting functionality                      
like isolating failing tests. Testrepository is compatible                      
with any test suite that can output subunit. This includes any                  
TAP test suite and any pyunit compatible test suite.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

Comment 2 Kashyap Chamarthy 2013-05-28 13:11:23 UTC
1/ Running fedora-review tool against rawhide fails w/ RPM build errors:

  $ fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rpm-spec -n ../SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm

fails with:
(from - /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/results/build.log)
----------
.
.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 16, in <module>
    from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named setuptools
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.w0YBti (%build)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.w0YBti (%build)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-testrepository.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace
    result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 359, in do
    raise mockbuild.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
 # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/python-testrepository.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAIS  
----------

Is the above due to python-3/python-2 ?


2/ However, running against Fedora-18, succeeds:
----------
$ fedora-review --rpm-spec -n ../SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm 
INFO: Processing local files: ../SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS
INFO:   --> SRPM url: file:///home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm
INFO: Using review directory: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository
INFO:   --> Spec url: file:///home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/srpm-unpacked/python-testrepository.spec
INFO: Downloading (Source0): http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testrepository/testrepository-0.0.15.tar.gz
INFO: Running checks and generating report

INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/results
INFO: WARNING: Probably non-rawhide buildroot used. Rawhide should be used for most package reviews
INFO: Build completed
INFO: Installing built package(s)
INFO: Install command returned error code 30
INFO: Starting new HTTPS connection (1): admin.fedoraproject.org
INFO: Starting new HTTPS connection (1): admin.fedoraproject.org
Review template in: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/review.txt
fedora-review is automated tool, but *YOU* are responsible for manually
reviewing the results and finishing the review. Do not just copy-paste
the results without understanding them.
----------

Proceeding with manual review with the above.

Comment 3 Kashyap Chamarthy 2013-05-28 13:12:44 UTC
Posting the result of fedora-review tool. Manual review upcoming...

kashyap@SPECS$ cat /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/review.txt

Package Review
==============

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-
     testrepository/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Python:
[ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: Mock build failed
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.


Installation errors
-------------------
INFO: mock.py version 1.1.29 starting...
Start: init plugins
INFO: selinux enabled
Finish: init plugins
Start: run
Mock Version: 1.1.29
INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.29
Start: lock buildroot
INFO: installing package(s): /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/results/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
ERROR: Command failed: 
 # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/fedora-18-x86_64/root/', 'install', '/home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SPECS/python-testrepository/results/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.noarch.rpm', '--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts']
Error: Package: python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.noarch (/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.noarch)
           Requires: python-subunit
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest



Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
python-testrepository.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US workflows -> work flows, work-flows, workloads
python-testrepository.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US subunit -> sub unit, sub-unit, suburbanite
python-testrepository.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pyunit -> impunity
python-testrepository.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary testr
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Requires
--------
python-testrepository (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python
    python(abi)
    python-fixtures
    python-subunit
    python-testtools



Provides
--------
python-testrepository:
    python-testrepository



MD5-sum check
-------------
http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/t/testrepository/testrepository-0.0.15.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : a6e7347077bd412915de1f89c5411b85da96abe07f43cd47939dc6f9e0228d94
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : a6e7347077bd412915de1f89c5411b85da96abe07f43cd47939dc6f9e0228d94


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29
Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n ../SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-1.fc18.src.rpm

Comment 4 Pádraig Brady 2013-05-28 14:03:33 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Provides a database of test results which can be used to                        
support easy developer workflows, supporting functionality                      
like isolating failing tests. Testrepository is compatible                      
with any test suite that can output subunit. This includes any                  
TAP test suite and any pyunit compatible test suite.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

Comment 5 Pádraig Brady 2013-05-29 01:46:51 UTC
Note the python-subunit install dependency failure is expected as python-subunit is in review also at present (see blocking bug)

Comment 6 Kashyap Chamarthy 2013-05-29 10:18:40 UTC
I noticed (& Matthais Runge pointed out too), that %check section is missing ?

----------
%check
%{__python} setup.py test
----------

I added the above to the SPEC file:

Ran a local build, successfully:
----------
$ rpmbuild -ba python-testrepository.spec
.
.
.
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.prg8hv
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd testrepository-0.0.15
+ /usr/bin/python setup.py test
running test
Checking .pth file support in .
/usr/bin/python -E -c pass
Searching for testtools>=0.9.30
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/testtools/
Reading https://github.com/testing-cabal/testtools
Reading https://launchpad.net/testtools
Best match: testtools 0.9.31
Downloading https://launchpad.net/testtools/trunk/0.9.31/+download/testtools-0.9.31.tar.gz
Processing testtools-0.9.31.tar.gz
Writing /tmp/easy_install-eiAhla/testtools-0.9.31/setup.cfg
Running testtools-0.9.31/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-eiAhla/testtools-0.9.31/egg-dist-tmp-6gzTiw
no previously-included directories found matching 'doc/_build'
.
.
.
Installed /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILD/testrepository-0.0.15/python_subunit-0.0.12-py2.7.egg
Searching for fixtures
Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/fixtures/
Reading https://launchpad.net/python-fixtures
Best match: fixtures 0.3.12
Downloading https://launchpad.net/python-fixtures/trunk/0.3.12/+download/fixtures-0.3.12.tar.gz
Processing fixtures-0.3.12.tar.gz
Writing /tmp/easy_install-rPxXL4/fixtures-0.3.12/setup.cfg
Running fixtures-0.3.12/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir /tmp/easy_install-rPxXL4/fixtures-0.3.12/egg-dist-tmp-QqVbQK
zip_safe flag not set; analyzing archive contents...
fixtures._fixtures.packagepath: module references __path__
fixtures.tests._fixtures.test_packagepath: module references __path__
.
.
.
.
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.xAn26W
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd testrepository-0.0.15
+ DOCDIR=/home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/doc/python-testrepository-0.0.15
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/doc/python-testrepository-0.0.15
+ cp -pr README.txt Apache-2.0 /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.x86_64/usr/share/doc/python-testrepository-0.0.15
+ exit 0
Provides: python-testrepository = 0.0.15-2.fc18
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHave
Prefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.7
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.x86_64
Wrote: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
Executing(%clean): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nmtpI9
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ cd testrepository-0.0.15
+ /usr/bin/rm -rf /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/python-testrepository-0.0.15-2.fc18.x86_64
+ exit 0
----------

Comment 7 Pádraig Brady 2013-05-29 10:36:50 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.15-3.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Provides a database of test results which can be used to
support easy developer workflows, supporting functionality                      
like isolating failing tests. Testrepository is compatible                      
with any test suite that can output subunit. This includes any                  
TAP test suite and any pyunit compatible test suite.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

Comment 8 Pádraig Brady 2013-05-30 08:56:03 UTC
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Provides a database of test results which can be used to
support easy developer workflows, supporting functionality                      
like isolating failing tests. Testrepository is compatible                      
with any test suite that can output subunit. This includes any                  
TAP test suite and any pyunit compatible test suite.
Fedora Account System Username: pbrady

Comment 9 Kashyap Chamarthy 2013-05-31 11:22:03 UTC
Manual Review:
--------------

Short 
~~~~~
- Looks good. 
- TODO: Once 'python-subunit' package is ready, I can do a koji scratch build.


Long:
~~~~~

Generic:

[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
--------
%files
%doc README.txt Apache-2.0
%{_bindir}/testr
%{python_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}
%{python_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info
--------
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 68 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/kashyap/rpmbuild/SRPMS/python-
     testrepository/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
	- We don't rely on Python Eggs, so the above is not applicable. Discussed this with Pádraig.

[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python


===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.


As usual, if something is missing, feel free to point it out.

Comment 10 Pádraig Brady 2013-06-04 14:50:30 UTC
subunit is now in place

Comment 11 Kashyap Chamarthy 2013-06-05 01:52:22 UTC
Scratch Build successful:
-------------------------

$ koji build --scratch rawhide python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm
Uploading srpm: python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm
[====================================] 100% 00:00:08  84.99 KiB   9.62 KiB/sec
Created task: 5468468
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5468468
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
5468468 build (rawhide, python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm): open (buildvm-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
  5468469 buildArch (python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
  5468469 buildArch (python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm, noarch): open (buildvm-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  1 open  1 done  0 failed
5468468 build (rawhide, python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm): open (buildvm-12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
  0 free  0 open  2 done  0 failed

5468468 build (rawhide, python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18.src.rpm) completed successfully

Looks good to me. Approved.

Comment 12 Pádraig Brady 2013-06-05 09:21:51 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-testrepository
Short Description: A repository of test results
Owners: pbrady mrunge
Branches: f18 f19 el6

Comment 13 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-06-05 10:21:37 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2013-06-05 13:37:17 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2013-06-05 13:38:26 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc19

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2013-06-05 13:39:34 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.el6

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2013-06-05 16:51:11 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2013-06-14 02:34:37 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2013-06-14 04:52:21 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

Comment 20 Fedora Update System 2013-06-21 19:39:34 UTC
python-testrepository-0.0.15-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

Comment 21 Pádraig Brady 2014-11-14 03:28:55 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: python-testrepository
New Branches: epel7
Owners: pbrady apevec

Comment 22 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-11-14 12:47:39 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.