Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Library for interacting with OAuth 1.0, 1.0A, 2 and Echo. Provides simplified client access and allows for construction of more complex apis and OAuth providers.
*** Bug 914923 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries. lib/sha1.js is BSD licensed, but also it's copied from jshash: http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/scripts.html [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. Needs something like this so that "require('vows')" works (but tests pass otherwise): %check cp -pr %{nodejs_sitelib} . [!]: nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US apis -> pis, apish, apes apis should probably be APIs. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. Note: Package contains no Conflicts: tag(s) [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: CheckResultdir [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 7 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [!]: SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}. Note: Source0 (oauth-0.9.8.tgz) [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.noarch.rpm nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.src.rpm nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US apis -> pis, apish, apes nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-oauth.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US apis -> pis, apish, apes 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-oauth nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US apis -> pis, apish, apes nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.noarch.rpm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) Provides -------- nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.noarch.rpm: nodejs-oauth = 0.9.8-1.fc18 npm(oauth) = 0.9.8 MD5-sum check ------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/oauth/-/oauth-0.9.8.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : dbff4da9078d6316474e3b6d2fe8c2c78c5b1713707692e19e39546ba4bbd84b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : dbff4da9078d6316474e3b6d2fe8c2c78c5b1713707692e19e39546ba4bbd84b Generated by fedora-review 0.3.1 (b71abc1) last change: 2012-10-16 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-1.fc18.src.rpm
Can you explain the logic behind the copying thing? I know you were doing that but my tests seemed to show that it wasn't necessary because node would find them anyway on account of /usr/lib/node_modules being on the default search path?
When I build the packages in mock with check enabled they always seem to fail without a workaround (eg, copying nodejs_sitelib). Does it work for you in mock? I can't think what might be different between our setups.
You seem to be right.. I have no idea how it is working for me outside of mock then ;-)
License updated, tests fixed and description adjusted: Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-2.fc18.src.rpm As far as the copying goes, one option is to remove that code and use the jshashes npm instead - except it turns out that has copied the code from the same place... I think I'm going to send a mail to the packaging list to try and get some general guidance on this question of when copy'n'paste becomes bundling.
I've opened a review ticket for nodejs-jshashes (#919689) but it seems likely that I will have to seek a bundling exemption. I think there is a good case for that however. Update spec and srpm utilising nodejs-jshashes in place of the bundled sha1.js: Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-3.fc18.src.rpm
So after all that I have now realised that the bundled sha1.js is never actually used on Fedora because it prefers to use the crypto module to compute the has if node has been built against openssl as the Fedora one has. So we can just remove it and patch out the fallback code: Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-4.fc18.src.rpm
Awesome! Issues: ======= [!]: Latest version is packaged. 0.9.10 released just a few days ago. This is the only issue though, and all tests pass with both 0.9.8 and 0.9.10. Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 7 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-4.fc18.noarch.rpm nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-oauth nodejs-oauth.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nodejs-oauth (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) Provides -------- nodejs-oauth: nodejs-oauth npm(oauth) MD5-sum check ------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/oauth/-/oauth-0.9.8.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : dbff4da9078d6316474e3b6d2fe8c2c78c5b1713707692e19e39546ba4bbd84b CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : dbff4da9078d6316474e3b6d2fe8c2c78c5b1713707692e19e39546ba4bbd84b Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --rpm-spec -n nodejs-oauth-0.9.8-4.fc18.src.rpm
Updated to 0.9.10: Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18.src.rpm
Sweet. Package approved!
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-oauth Short Description: Library for interacting with OAuth 1.0, 1.0A, 2 and Echo Owners: tomh Branches: f18 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18, nodejs-srs-0.2.20-1.fc18, nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-3.fc18, nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-2.fc18, nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-1.fc18, nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18, nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18, nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18, nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-3075/nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-1.fc18,nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18,nodejs-srs-0.2.20-1.fc18,nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-3.fc18,nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-2.fc18,nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18,nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18,nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18,nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18,nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18,nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18,nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18
nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18, nodejs-srs-0.2.20-1.fc18, nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-3.fc18, nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-2.fc18, nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-1.fc18, nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18, nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18, nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18, nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18, nodejs-srs-0.2.20-1.fc18, nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-3.fc18, nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-2.fc18, nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-1.fc18, nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18, carto-0.9.4-1.fc18, nodejs-passport-oauth-0.1.14-3.fc18, nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18, nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18, nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18, nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18, carto-0.9.4-1.fc18, nodejs-passport-oauth-0.1.14-3.fc18, nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-2.fc18, nodejs-srs-0.2.20-2.fc18, nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-4.fc18, nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-3.fc18, nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18, nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18, nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
nodejs-xml2js-0.2.6-2.fc18, nodejs-oauth-0.9.10-1.fc18, carto-0.9.4-1.fc18, nodejs-passport-oauth-0.1.14-3.fc18, nodejs-millstone-0.5.15-2.fc18, nodejs-srs-0.2.20-2.fc18, nodejs-sqlite3-2.1.5-4.fc18, nodejs-zipfile-0.3.4-3.fc18, nodejs-chrono-1.0.4-1.fc18, nodejs-sphericalmercator-1.0.2-1.fc18, nodejs-mapnik-reference-5.0.4-2.fc18, nodejs-passport-0.1.16-1.fc18, nodejs-step-0.0.5-1.fc18, nodejs-zap-0.2.5-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.