Bug 915779 - [RHEVM] Failed upgrade RHEVM with remote DB installation
Summary: [RHEVM] Failed upgrade RHEVM with remote DB installation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-setup
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.1.3
Assignee: Alex Lourie
QA Contact: vvyazmin@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard: integration
Depends On: 915028
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-26 13:45 UTC by Idith Tal-Kohen
Modified: 2013-03-12 14:30 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The taskcleaner utility was called with localhost parameters only, ignoring remote database settings. Consequently, upgrading the Manager using a remote database failed, because of incorrect taskcleaner utility execution. Now, the correct parameters are added when executing the taskcleaner utility, so upgrading the Manager on a remote database server succeeds.
Clone Of: 915028
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-12 14:30:28 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0557 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rhevm 3.1.3 bug fix update 2013-03-12 18:26:15 UTC
oVirt gerrit 12381 0 None None None Never

Comment 3 vvyazmin@redhat.com 2013-03-03 15:58:58 UTC 
No issues are found

Verified on RHEVM 3.2 - SF09 environment:

RHEVM: rhevm-3.2.0-10.10.beta1.el6ev.noarch
VDSM: vdsm-4.10.2-10.0.el6ev.x86_64
LIBVIRT: libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6.x86_64
QEMU & KVM: qemu-kvm-rhev-0.12.1.2-2.355.el6_4.1.x86_64
SANLOCK: sanlock-2.6-2.el6.x86_64
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-03-12 14:30:28 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0557.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.