Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 916314

Summary: Datatable and ExtendedDatatable evaluate value attribute even if rendered=false
Product: [Retired] JBoss Enterprise WFK Platform 2 Reporter: ivassile
Component: RichFacesAssignee: Brian Leathem <bleathem>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Jan Papousek <jpapouse>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2.1.0CC: kpiwko, oskutka, rruss
Target Milestone: ER2   
Target Release: 2.2.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-14 14:50:01 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ivassile 2013-02-27 19:49:48 UTC
Description of problem:
See RF-11382 (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11382)

Comment 1 Jan Papousek 2013-03-14 10:41:58 UTC
verified, it works as expected

Comment 2 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-03-14 10:43:20 UTC
Jan Papousek <jpapouse> updated the status of jira RF-11382 to Closed

Comment 3 Karel Piwko 2013-05-14 14:50:01 UTC
Closed as CURRENTRELEASE, part of WFK 2.2.0 distributables.

Comment 4 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-07-23 13:50:26 UTC
Andrey Zhemoytuk <a.zhemoytuk> made a comment on jira RF-11382

Still the issue is reproducible on postback (at least when partial state saving is turned off).

Tried with RichFaces 4.3.3.Final and JSF 2.1.24 the following example:

{code:xml}
  <h:form>
    <rich:dataTable rendered="false" value="#{viewScope.put('invoked', true)}">
    </rich:dataTable>

    <a4j:commandButton value="Postback" execute="@this" render="result"/>
  </h:form>
  
  <h:panelGroup id="result">
    #{invoked}
  </h:panelGroup>
{code}

Comment 5 JBoss JIRA Server 2013-07-29 21:47:30 UTC
Brian Leathem <bleathem> made a comment on jira RF-11382

[~a.zhemoytuk] can you file a new issue for the partial state saving = false use case?