RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 918460 - semanage boolean -m BOOLEAN_NAME tracebacks
Summary: semanage boolean -m BOOLEAN_NAME tracebacks
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: policycoreutils
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Daniel Walsh
QA Contact: Michal Trunecka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-06 09:42 UTC by Milos Malik
Modified: 2018-08-02 07:49 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.34.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 11:07:37 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1608 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE policycoreutils bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:39:06 UTC

Description Milos Malik 2013-03-06 09:42:27 UTC
Description of problem:
The same problem as described in BZ#918140 appears on RHEL-6.4 too.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-python-2.0.83-19.30.el6.i686
policycoreutils-gui-2.0.83-19.30.el6.i686
policycoreutils-2.0.83-19.30.el6.i686
policycoreutils-newrole-2.0.83-19.30.el6.i686

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# semanage boolean -m xen_use_nfs
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/sbin/semanage", line 564, in <module>
    process_args(sys.argv[1:])
  File "/usr/sbin/semanage", line 442, in process_args
    OBJECT.modify(target, value, use_file)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/seobject.py", line 2060, in modify
    self.__mod(name, value)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/seobject.py", line 2027, in __mod
    if value.upper() in self.dict:
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'upper'
# echo $?
1
#

Actual results:
 * a traceback

Expected results:
 * either specified action is done or an error message "you forgot to specify ..." is displayed

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2013-09-05 10:20:54 UTC
Ok, I have a RHEL6 patch for this issue.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2013-09-05 10:40:43 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 11:07:37 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1608.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.