Bug 919260 - Review Request: gtkspellmm30 - C++ bindings for gtkspell3
Summary: Review Request: gtkspellmm30 - C++ bindings for gtkspell3
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Tardon
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-07 23:11 UTC by Sandro Mani
Modified: 2013-05-05 02:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-01 04:25:07 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
dtardon: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sandro Mani 2013-03-07 23:11:21 UTC
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/gtkspellmm30.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/gtkspellmm30-3.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: On-the-fly spell checking for GtkTextView widgets - C++ bindings
Fedora Account System Username: smani

Comment 1 David Tardon 2013-04-26 07:44:55 UTC
Problems:

1. Both tarball and spec claim that the package's license is GPLv2+, but the code appear to be LGPLv2.1+ .

2. The -devel subpackage should depend on base package of the same arch. I.e., %{name}{%?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} .

3. The -doc subpackage should not depend on base package (at least i suppose you don't need the library to read the documentation). Note that you have to add COPYING to it after removing the dependency.

4. Explicit requires in -devel subpackage are not necessary (except on the base package). rpmbuild will generate them.

5. %defattr is not necessary.

Comment 2 Sandro Mani 2013-04-26 13:08:40 UTC
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/gtkspellmm30.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm

* Fri Apr 26 2013 Sandro Mani <manisandro> - 3.0.1-1
- New upstream release (uses correct GPLv2 license headers)

All noted problems are fixed.

A note on the -doc dependency: this seems to rather arbitrary, looking at other packages. Perhaps one should mention it on fedora-devel and have a note added to the packaging guidelines, whether or not the base package should be a dependency?

Anyway, thanks!

Comment 3 David Tardon 2013-04-26 13:46:04 UTC
Nitpick: The dependency on pkgconfig in -devel is not necessary either. rpmbuild will generate it, because the subpackage contains a .pc file (and therefore provides pkgconfig(gtkspellmm-3.0)).

Comment 4 David Tardon 2013-04-26 13:46:38 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
  Note: Found : Packager: David Tardon <dtardon>
  See: (this test has no URL)


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     gtkspellmm30-doc
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/dtardon/work/rpm/919260-gtkspellmm30/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
          gtkspellmm30-devel-3.0.1-1.fc18.x86_64.rpm
          gtkspellmm30-doc-3.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
gtkspellmm30-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint gtkspellmm30-devel gtkspellmm30-doc gtkspellmm30
gtkspellmm30-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libatkmm-1.6.so.1
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgdkmm-3.0.so.1
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgiomm-2.4.so.1
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpangomm-1.4.so.1
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgtk-3.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libcairomm-1.0.so.1
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgdk-3.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libcairo-gobject.so.2
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libcairo.so.2
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
gtkspellmm30.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
gtkspellmm30-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    gtkspellmm30(x86-64)
    libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
    pkgconfig
    pkgconfig(glibmm-2.4)
    pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
    pkgconfig(gtkmm-3.0)
    pkgconfig(gtkspell3-3.0)

gtkspellmm30-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gtkmm30-doc

gtkspellmm30 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /sbin/ldconfig
    libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libatkmm-1.6.so.1()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairomm-1.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
    libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdkmm-3.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgiomm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtkmm-3.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libgtkspell3-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangomm-1.4.so.1()(64bit)
    libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6()(64bit)
    libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
gtkspellmm30-devel:
    gtkspellmm30-devel
    gtkspellmm30-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(gtkspellmm-3.0)

gtkspellmm30-doc:
    gtkspellmm30-doc

gtkspellmm30:
    gtkspellmm30
    gtkspellmm30(x86-64)
    libgtkspellmm-3.0.so.0()(64bit)



MD5-sum check
-------------
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gtkspell/files/gtkspellmm/gtkspellmm-3.0.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 61d98f85a1a4b923f4fd7de465e0b7518cf1c630e7af0912b53723e28a511d8b
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 61d98f85a1a4b923f4fd7de465e0b7518cf1c630e7af0912b53723e28a511d8b


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29
Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 919260

Comment 5 Sandro Mani 2013-04-26 14:43:56 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: gtkspellmm30
Short On-the-fly spell checking for GtkTextView widgets - C++ bindings
Owners: smani
Branches: f18 f19

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-04-26 15:00:52 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-04-26 15:58:36 UTC
gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc19

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-04-26 16:08:49 UTC
gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc18

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-04-27 00:10:36 UTC
gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-05-01 04:25:09 UTC
gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2013-05-05 02:22:09 UTC
gtkspellmm30-3.0.1-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.