Bug 919308 - SIGSEGV on one particular case
Summary: SIGSEGV on one particular case
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: graphviz
Version: 18
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 919704 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-08 03:06 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2013-09-17 00:33 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-17 00:33:14 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed fix (1023 bytes, patch)
2013-09-02 12:29 UTC, Jaroslav Škarvada
no flags Details | Diff

Description Miro Hrončok 2013-03-08 03:06:21 UTC
Description of problem:
When I run `dot  -Tsvg -O  file.dot` on this code:

digraph d {
	edge [constraint=false];
	a -> b;
	b -> a [label="whatever"];
}

It SIGSEGVs.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.28.0-26.fc18

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
Save this code to a file and run the command.
  
Actual results:
SIGSEGV

Expected results:
Output should be created or an actual error should be shown, if there is a mistake in the code.

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2013-03-10 10:53:58 UTC
*** Bug 919704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2013-08-16 04:44:07 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 3 Mat Booth 2013-08-31 18:58:16 UTC
This seems to be fixed in graphviz-2.30.1-10.fc19.x86_64 that is available in F19 -- I do not see the segfault that you are seeing.

Maybe 2.30.1 should be back-ported to F18?

Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2013-08-31 22:24:19 UTC
(In reply to Mat Booth from comment #3)
> This seems to be fixed in graphviz-2.30.1-10.fc19.x86_64 that is available
> in F19 -- I do not see the segfault that you are seeing.
Yes, it works for me also.

> Maybe 2.30.1 should be back-ported to F18?
Definitively.

Comment 5 Jaroslav Škarvada 2013-09-02 12:29:25 UTC
Created attachment 792815 [details]
Proposed fix

-1 for the rebase

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-09-02 13:08:44 UTC
graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18

Comment 7 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2013-09-02 13:38:24 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-09-02 23:33:36 UTC
Package graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15690/graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-09-17 00:33:14 UTC
graphviz-2.28.0-27.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.