Bug 920037 - Review Request: maven-jsf-plugin - Maven plugin for generating tlds, jsp tag sources and others
Summary: Review Request: maven-jsf-plugin - Maven plugin for generating tlds, jsp tag ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: gil cattaneo
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 920039
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-11 09:00 UTC by Michal Srb
Modified: 2013-06-28 07:10 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-28 07:10:46 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
puntogil: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michal Srb 2013-03-11 09:00:13 UTC
Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/maven-jsf-plugin.spec
SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/maven-jsf-plugin-1.2.3-1.fc19.src.rpm
Description: This Maven plugin contains several goals that can be used
to generate tlds, jsp tag sources, component sources,
faces-config.xml and facelets-taglib file.
Fedora Account System Username: msrb

Comment 1 gil cattaneo 2013-04-17 06:17:00 UTC
hi a new release is available 1.3.0, consider upgrade ...?

Comment 2 gil cattaneo 2013-04-17 06:47:35 UTC
Package Review
==============

Key:
[x] = Pass
[!] = Fail
[-] = Not applicable
[?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
- Pom files have correct add_maven_depmap call
  Note: No add_maven_depmap calls found but pom files present
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#add_maven_depmap_macro
- Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation
- Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
  subpackage
  Note: No javadoc subpackage present
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/920037-maven-jsf-
     plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

Java:
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
     when building with ant
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
     utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

Java:
[x]: Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.)

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached
     diff).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: maven-jsf-plugin-1.2.3-1.fc19.noarch.rpm
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tlds -> teds, tads, tildes
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) jsp -> esp, asp, tsp
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tlds -> teds, tads, tildes
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jsp -> esp, asp, tsp
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml, x ml
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US facelets -> faceless, face lets, face-lets
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US taglib -> ta glib, ta-glib, tag lib
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.3-2 ['1.2.3-1.fc19', '1.2.3-1']
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint maven-jsf-plugin
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tlds -> teds, tads, scolds
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) jsp -> esp, asp, tsp
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tlds -> teds, tads, scolds
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US jsp -> esp, asp, tsp
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US config -> con fig, con-fig, configure
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xml -> XML, ml, x ml
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US facelets -> faceless, face lets, face-lets
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US taglib -> ta glib, ta-glib, tag lib
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.3-2 ['1.2.3-1.fc19', '1.2.3-1']
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
--- /home/gil/920037-maven-jsf-plugin/srpm/maven-jsf-plugin.spec	2013-04-17 08:30:20.223921338 +0200
+++ /home/gil/920037-maven-jsf-plugin/srpm-unpacked/maven-jsf-plugin.spec	2013-04-17 08:30:21.293865023 +0200
@@ -32,5 +32,5 @@
 
 %build
-%mvn_build
+%mvn_build -f
 
 %install


Requires
--------
maven-jsf-plugin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    java
    jpackage-utils
    mvn(commons-digester:commons-digester)
    mvn(commons-lang:commons-lang)
    mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api)
    mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-project)



Provides
--------
maven-jsf-plugin:
    maven-jsf-plugin
    mvn(org.primefaces:maven-jsf-plugin)



MD5-sum check
-------------
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cfc7749b96f63bd31c3c42b5c471bf756814053e847c10f3eb003417bc523d30



fix this problem
maven-jsf-plugin.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.3-2 ['1.2.3-1.fc19', '1.2.3-1']

Comment 3 gil cattaneo 2013-04-17 06:50:23 UTC
another problem is
- Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java

fix with 
%package        javadoc
Summary:        Javadoc for %{name}
Requires:       jpackage-utils

...

regards

Comment 4 gil cattaneo 2013-04-17 07:17:22 UTC
hi
seem miss Group fields in the spec file
regards

Comment 5 gil cattaneo 2013-04-17 07:21:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> hi
> seem miss Group fields in the spec file
> regards

ops sorry ignore this request
thanks

Comment 6 Michal Srb 2013-04-17 07:56:59 UTC
thanks for the review, I will update the package to the latest upstream version.


New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: maven-jsf-plugin
Short Description: Maven plugin for generating tlds, jsp tag sources and others
Owners: msrb sochotni mizdebsk tradej
Branches: f19
InitialCC: java-sig

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-04-17 15:17:48 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Michal Srb 2013-06-28 07:10:46 UTC
Thanks for the review and the repo. The package is in Rawhide now, closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.