Bug 920136 - 3.1.z: vdsm: performance issues for SPM when one of the domains is inactive
Summary: 3.1.z: vdsm: performance issues for SPM when one of the domains is inactive
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: vdsm
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.1.4
Assignee: Federico Simoncelli
QA Contact: Dafna Ron
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
: 918579 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 880098
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-11 12:26 UTC by Idith Tal-Kohen
Modified: 2018-12-03 18:27 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Performance speed for Storage Pool Manager (SPM) tasks was reduced when the ISO domain was inactive and disconnected from the SPM. Now, VDSM computes the ISO prefix asynchronously, and does not wait for the ISO domain to report its prefix before executing SPM tasks, so the performance of SPM tasks remains constant.
Clone Of: 880098
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-04 11:03:11 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 271383 0 None None None 2018-12-01 16:40:54 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0704 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE rhev 3.1.3.2 - vdsm bug fix update 2013-04-04 15:02:29 UTC

Comment 2 Lee Yarwood 2013-03-11 12:44:28 UTC 
*** Bug 918579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Cheryn Tan 2013-03-21 02:15:44 UTC 
Federico, please review the Doc Text and edit if necessary. Thank you!
Comment 6 Dafna Ron 2013-03-27 14:04:50 UTC 
verified on vdsm-4.10.2-1.9.el6ev.x86_64
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-04-04 11:03:11 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0704.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.