Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 920733

Summary: hwcert-client 1.6.4 R27 fv_* tests fails when quests' rc.local call old v7 script
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Hardware Certification Program Reporter: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Component: Test Suite (tests)Assignee: Greg Nichols <gnichols>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 1.6.4CC: bbrock, qcai, rlandry
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 920726 Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-08-06 17:47:32 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 920726, 920737    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
provide old script name to guest callers. none

Description Greg Nichols 2013-03-12 15:51:35 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #920726 +++

Description of problem:

Existing guest images call "v7-guest-script" from their rc.local.  To provide backwards compatabilty with these images, v7 should provide the old name as an alias to hwcert-guest-script.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

hwcert-client 1.6.4
Comment 1 Greg Nichols 2013-03-12 15:52:29 UTC 
Created attachment 709036 [details]
provide old script name to guest callers.
Comment 4 Greg Nichols 2013-06-19 00:39:16 UTC 
verified on hwcert-client 1.6.4 R55
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-08-06 17:47:32 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1139.html