Spec URL: http://doshitan.com/tmp/gnome-klotski/gnome-klotski.spec SRPM URL: http://doshitan.com/tmp/gnome-klotski/gnome-klotski-3.7.91-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: This is the GNOME Klotski game rpmlint: gnome-klotski.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gnome-klotski-3.7.91/COPYING 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
Taking for review.
Tanner, are you a Fedora packager or do you need sponsoring first?
Fedora review gnome-klotski-3.7.91-1.fc19.src.rpm 2013-03-23 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint gnome-klotski \ gnome-klotski-debuginfo-3.7.91-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm \ gnome-klotski-3.7.91-1.fc19.src.rpm gnome-klotski.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gnome-klotski-3.7.91/COPYING 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. + Rpmlint error is harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 01382e8edc6481206a006b2205ff104c gnome-klotski-3.7.91.tar.xz 01382e8edc6481206a006b2205ff104c Download/gnome-klotski-3.7.91.tar.xz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files + Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Looks good overall! I have a few minor nitpicks below, but none of them are a review blocker. 1. > Provides: gnome-games-gnotski = 1:3.7.90 The provide isn't really necessary here, I believe. Nothing in the repo Requires gnome-games-gnotski. 2. Might be nice to sort BRs and the %files list. 3. > %find_lang %{name} --all-name --with-gnome The --all-name switch shouldn't be necessary here: all the docs / translations installed are under the 'gnome-klotski' name. 4. > %{_mandir}/man6/gnome-klotski.6.gz The man page compression is done by rpm and might change in the future, would be safer to use a glob here: %{_mandir}/man6/gnome-klotski.6* I'd normally mark the package as fedora-review+ at this point, but it looks like you need sponsoring to the packager group first, right?
Incorporates the suggestions mentioned above. 3.8.0-1 - Update to 3.8.0 3.7.92-1 - Update to 3.7.92 - Use old desktop file name Spec URL: http://doshitan.com/tmp/gnome-klotski/gnome-klotski.spec SRPM URL: http://doshitan.com/tmp/gnome-klotski/gnome-klotski-3.8.0-1.fc19.src.rpm
Looks very nice! APPROVED I've also sponsored you to the packager group, so feel free to go ahead and request the git repo next. It can take up to an hour for the permissions to sync, after that you should be able to set the fedora-cvs flag in bugzilla. Let me know on IRC / e-mail if you have any issues or want to discuss something.
Using upstream's description blurb. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-klotski Short Description: Slide blocks to solve the puzzle Owners: doshitan Branches: f19 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Forgot to close the bug. Imported and built in rawhide and f19.