Bug 921280
| Summary: | thin_pool_autoextend_threshold does not work when thin pool is a stacked raid device | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Corey Marthaler <cmarthal> |
| Component: | lvm2 | Assignee: | Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 6.4 | CC: | agk, dwysocha, heinzm, jbrassow, jentrena, msnitzer, nperic, pkennedy, prajnoha, prockai, slevine, thornber, zkabelac |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | lvm2-2.02.100-3.el6 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
| Doc Text: |
Support for more complicated device stack for thinpool has been enhanced to properly support resize of more complex volumes like mirrors or raids. The new lvm2 version now support thin data volume extension on raids. Support for mirrors has been deactivated.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2013-11-21 23:21:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 960054 | ||
|
Description
Corey Marthaler
2013-03-13 20:49:22 UTC
Device stacking needs to be addressed in multiple areas of lvm2 code base. The unit test for this is simply to create a pool device on RAID and try to extend it. 1) create RAID LV 2) convert it to thin pool 3) attempt to extend -- FAIL. Upstream commits: 4c001a7 thin: fix resize of stacked thin pool volume 6552966 thin: fix monitoring of thin pool volume 0670bfe thin: validation catch multiseg thin pool/volumes Tested and Marking VERIFIED with: lvm2-2.02.100-5.el6.x86_64 tested by successfully running the test suite from comment 1 and the reproducer from comment 8. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1704.html |