Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 922542

Summary:	[FEAT] Please add support to replace multiple bricks at a time.
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	hans
Component:	glusterd	Assignee:	bugs <bugs>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	mainline	CC:	bugs, gluster-bugs, nsathyan
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2015-10-22 15:46:38 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description hans 2013-03-17 19:20:48 UTC

Description of problem:

Only 1 replace-brick can be active for a volume. The action in itself typically takes days, so when lots of bricks have to be replaced this is a very lengthy process. Adding support for multiple replace-bricks running in parallel would greatly help.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

3.2.5, 3.3.1

How reproducible:

Start a replace-brick. Now try to start a second one.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. gluster volume replace-brick vol-a b c start
2. gluster volume replace-brick vol-a d e start
  
Actual results:

Step 2 cannot run when step 1 is still active.

Expected results:

Step 2 can run.

Additional info:

Comment 1 hans 2013-03-20 10:54:24 UTC

Additionally it would be very nice if add-brick would work while replace-brick is active.

Comment 2 shishir gowda 2013-04-08 05:24:43 UTC

This is request for a new feature/enhancement. Added the [FEAT] field in the summary

Comment 3 Niels de Vos 2014-11-27 14:45:15 UTC

Feature requests make most sense against the 'mainline' release, there is no ETA for an implementation and requests might get forgotten when filed against a particular version.

Comment 4 Kaleb KEITHLEY 2015-10-22 15:46:38 UTC

because of the large number of bugs filed against mainline version\ is ambiguous and about to be removed as a choice.

If you believe this is still a bug, please change the status back to NEW and choose the appropriate, applicable version for it.