Bug 922864 - [abrt] virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6-1.fc18: hit_next: Process /usr/bin/virtuoso-t was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6-1.fc18: hit_next: Process /usr/bin/virtuoso-...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: virtuoso-opensource
Version: 18
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e2ad9633ca140fdd58e0ff0bec0...
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-18 17:11 UTC by Scott Williams
Modified: 2014-11-04 00:22 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-02-05 23:06:05 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (11.44 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:11 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: cgroup (130 bytes, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:11 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: core_backtrace (1.08 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: dso_list (2.81 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: environ (1.77 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: limits (1.29 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: maps (14.23 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: open_fds (463 bytes, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: proc_pid_status (962 bytes, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: smolt_data (2.40 KB, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details
File: var_log_messages (309 bytes, text/plain)
2013-03-18 17:12 UTC, Scott Williams
no flags Details

Description Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:11:02 UTC
Description of problem:
It appears virtuoso was essentially DOSing my disk.  Machine locked up on disk IO.

Version-Release number of selected component:
virtuoso-opensource-6.1.6-1.fc18

Additional info:
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        /usr/bin/virtuoso-t +foreground +configfile /tmp/virtuoso_n27607.ini +wait
crash_function: hit_next
executable:     /usr/bin/virtuoso-t
kernel:         3.8.2-206.fc18.x86_64
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (8 frames)
 #0 hit_next at Dkhashext.c:142
 #1 dbs_registry_to_array at regist.c:482
 #2 dbs_write_registry at regist.c:502
 #3 dbs_cpt_recov at neodisk.c:1698
 #4 dbs_from_file at disk.c:3490
 #5 wi_open_dbs at disk.c:3572
 #6 wi_open at disk.c:3639
 #7 srv_global_init at sqlsrv.c:3804

Potential duplicate: bug 713530

Comment 1 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:11:55 UTC
Created attachment 712126 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:11:58 UTC
Created attachment 712127 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:02 UTC
Created attachment 712128 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:10 UTC
Created attachment 712129 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:11 UTC
Created attachment 712130 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:18 UTC
Created attachment 712131 [details]
File: limits

Comment 7 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:19 UTC
Created attachment 712132 [details]
File: maps

Comment 8 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:21 UTC
Created attachment 712133 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 9 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:22 UTC
Created attachment 712134 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 10 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:23 UTC
Created attachment 712135 [details]
File: smolt_data

Comment 11 Scott Williams 2013-03-18 17:12:25 UTC
Created attachment 712136 [details]
File: var_log_messages

Comment 12 GroovieMan 2013-06-14 08:39:33 UTC
I have a similar problem. After login i receive
a /usr/bin/virtuoso-t SIGSEGV. After all the
desktop is fucking slow with some freeze-minutes.

Sometimes i have to perform a hard-reset to get 
my computer (i7 16Gb ram) back to work for me.

I am using the btrfs, maybe both openvirtuoso
and the fs cause a problem.

Please help!

Comment 13 GroovieMan 2013-06-15 12:40:13 UTC
It looks like, that virtuoso-opensource is required
by KDE. Maybe we'd better adress this problem to the
KDE guys.

Is noboys @redhat/fedora interested with this issue ???

Comment 14 Scott Williams 2013-06-15 18:07:18 UTC
Yeah, my guess is that this is caused by akonadi.  For what it's worth, it hasn't been an issue lately.  I'm going to close this as fixed upstream.

Comment 15 Scott Williams 2013-06-15 18:09:44 UTC
Chris, 

Sorry I didn't see your other comment.  I just replied to your last email.  I reported this bug while running ext4, so I'm not sure it's a btrfs issue.  My guess is that akonadi was maxing out the IO on the hard drive or at least putting a load on it when other processes are running.

If you still think this issue is ongoing, let's keep it open.

Scott

Comment 16 Patrick O'Callaghan 2013-06-26 20:41:54 UTC
I also am getting a SEGV from virtuouso-t (same version but on i686) on every login. Have tried to report it using Abrt but that doesn't seem to do anything (the interface is so bad it's hard to tell, but that's another story).

The error message is:

virtuoso-t[2380]: segfault at 8 ip 0846adfb sp bfa6ee34 error 4 in virtuoso-t[8045000+9fa000]

Comment 17 vikram goyal 2013-12-06 05:30:27 UTC
Due to similar crash I had lodged a report. I had initially thought that it might have occurred due to my home partition filling up to 100%.

The concerned bug report is:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038890


But there was another crash right after I had cleared the home partition creating around 30GB of space & rebooting the system.


Reporting through abrt, I got he following comment.

--- Running report_uReport ---
A bug was already filed about this problem:
Bugzilla: URL=https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922864

Comment 18 Fedora End Of Life 2013-12-21 15:26:21 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 18 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 18. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 
'version' of '18'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 18's end of life.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be 
able to fix it before Fedora 18 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior to Fedora 18's end of life.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 19 Fedora End Of Life 2014-02-05 23:06:05 UTC
Fedora 18 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2014-01-14. Fedora 18 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 20 Lorenzo Calabrese 2014-05-14 04:05:49 UTC
I ackn that Fedora 18 is over and 19 will be in short...
however,

I am afraid that this problem is far more frequent that this bug log seem to show up.
Actually I'v caught/seen some of my users CLOSING or KILLING the ABRT imediatelly when it come up with the virtuoso stuff...
And at coffee break I heard jokes about the virtuoso "tada" (noise that use to do M$ Win when open)...

So my guess is that there are far more users with this problem and no one report because the abrt say: problem yet repported...

I strongly suggest to reopen the issue.
A solution would be really welcome and I know how bad is for the reputation to let "cristalyze" this kind of problems...

I am actually realy short in time in order to be able do handle this at full (perso problems/divorce "alla siciliana") and will come later "in force" back on the matter.

But for now, I will apreciate if anyone can take from the following hint.

??? mysld vs mariadb ???

here we go.

With Fedora 20, I have 6 machines (some i686, some x86_64) 
and 4 of theses STILL give the seg fault at EVERY login !!! 
this, if the machine does not completely stop responding for minutes... just when the user is waiting to receive the hand...
Realy anoying.

1 of theses machines is OUT OF the problema :
dedicated web server / NO graphic services / NO Kde / No akonadi / and the only Virtuoso is the Admin-pianist.

4 machines give (always) SEG FAULT error at login time :
- KDE / akonadi ...
- mariadb INSTEAD of mysqld
(i686 and x86_64)

The last one of theses have :
- KDE/akonadi/virtuoso 
but 
mysqld instead of mariadb
and the problem does not show up (to yet ?)
(i686)

So:
since virtuoso seems to be coupled/dependent in KDE to akonadi
&&
since akonadi com installed with "akonadi-mysql"

Could not we wonder if there is not some compatibility/bad interraction/issue with mariadb ?

pearheaps some one feeling free with mariadb and mysqld could give a look in order to validate / invalidate this track?

thanks.
Lo.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.