It seems that openwsman source code carries code for possible rubygem-openwsman. Could you please consider to provide this gem instead of openwsman-ruby? Not that I am user of this code, but it seems to be more convenient way of distributing Ruby binding than providing -ruby package. Thank you for considering.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle. Changing version to '20'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20
Created attachment 871939 [details] convert -ruby to rubygem- These are the proposed changes required to provide rubygem- instead of -ruby package. Unfortunately, there is no test suite available during build, so I did not tested the package, except basic smoke test, that I am able to require the gem. Also, I am not expert on CMake, so there might be better way how to disable the installation of plain Ruby bindings other then replacing the content of cmake_install.cmake file.
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #2) > Also, I am not expert on CMake, so there might be better way how to disable > the installation of plain Ruby bindings other then replacing the content of > cmake_install.cmake file. Actually, other option might be to use -DBUILD_RUBY to entirely disable the build of Ruby bindings and prepare the .gem later by some local CMake call ...
Thanks for help!
You are welcome.