RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 924362 - New alternatives doesn't verify if /lib*/xtables is symlinked correctly
Summary: New alternatives doesn't verify if /lib*/xtables is symlinked correctly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: iptables
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Thomas Woerner
QA Contact: Ales Zelinka
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 835616 947773
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-21 15:44 UTC by Jacob Hunt
Modified: 2019-06-13 07:53 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 23:34:27 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1710 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE iptables bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:51:52 UTC

Description Jacob Hunt 2013-03-21 15:44:17 UTC
Description of problem:

The iptables-1.4.7-9.el6 RPM added "alternatives" functionality to the package moving its /lib*/xtables directory.  Normally upon upgrading to this package, the old /lib*/xtables directory is replaced with a symlink pointing to /etc/alternatives/lib-xtables.%{_arch}.

However, if we install custom iptables plugin files in /lib*/xtables, when we do "yum upgrade" that upgrades us to iptables-1.4.7-9.el6, the /lib*/xtables symlink does not get created.

The "alternatives" command should have failed when it couldn't create the slave symlink?  The iptables package should detect that all of its symlinks weren't created.


Why doesn't "alternatives" report this failure to create some of the package's slave symlinks?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

iptables-1.4.7-9.el6

How reproducible:

Always
  
Actual results:

Here's showing the alternatives command not detecting the problem:
========
$ ls -l /lib64/xtables
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36 Mar 16 13:25 /lib64/xtables -> /etc/alternatives/lib-xtables.x86_64/
$ sudo rm /lib64/xtables
$ sudo mkdir /lib64/xtables
$ sudo alternatives --auto iptables.x86_64
$ echo $?
0
$ ls -l /lib64/xtables
total 0
========

Expected results:

I can put it back with:
========
$ sudo rmdir /lib64/xtables
$ sudo alternatives --auto iptables.x86_64
$ ls -l /lib64/xtables
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36 Mar 16 13:38 /lib64/xtables -> /etc/alternatives/lib-xtables.x86_64/
========

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 23:34:27 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1710.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.