Bug 927452 (rlglue) - Review Request: rlglue - Reinforcement Learning Glue
Summary: Review Request: rlglue - Reinforcement Learning Glue
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: rlglue
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: python-rlglue
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-03-25 23:38 UTC by Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
Modified: 2018-01-25 22:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-25 22:44:15 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-03-25 23:38:14 UTC
Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/rlglue/rlglue.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/rlglue/rlglue-3.04-1.fc20.src.rpm

Description: 
RL-Glue (Reinforcement Learning Glue) provides a standard interface that allows
you to connect reinforcement learning agents, environments, and experiment
programs together, even if they are written in different languages. 


Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha

RPMS at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/rlglue/

rpmlint output:
[ankur@dhcppc1  fedora-reviews]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/rlglue.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rlglue-3.04-1.fc18.src.rpm
rlglue.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librlgluenetdev-0:0:0.so.0.0.0 exit.5
rlglue-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/rlglue-3.04/src/rlglue/RL_glue.h
rlglue-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/rlglue-3.04/src/RL_glue.c
rlglue-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
[ankur@dhcppc1  fedora-reviews]$

Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2014-05-17 19:01:21 UTC
> %package docs
> BuildArch:      noarch
> Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> Summary:        Documentation for %{name}

Please don't add such dependencies to documentation packages unless the documentation can only be displayed using programs contained within the base package.

Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2015-12-21 11:59:03 UTC
Same question as the other bug: this one doesn't have a reviewer yet, does that make it a dead review or one waiting for a reviewer? Deadreview says "lack of submitter response" but since a review hasn't occurred, I haven't anything to respond to?

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2018-01-25 22:44:15 UTC
Upstream seems dead, so packaging this isn't a good idea. Closing.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.