Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc18.src.rpm FAS Username: patches Description: Hawk is an HTTP authentication scheme using a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm to provide partial HTTP request cryptographic verification
Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package has unsatisfied dependencies: Requires: npm(sntp) < 0.2 Requires: npm(sntp) >= 0.1 Requires: npm(boom) >= 0.3 Requires: npm(hoek) < 0.8 Requires: npm(boom) < 0.4 Requires: npm(cryptiles) >= 0.1 Requires: npm(hoek) >= 0.7 - Rpmlint issues: nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.0-1 ['0.11.1-1.fc20', '0.11.1-1'] nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/uri.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/images/hawk.png nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/index.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/package.json nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/example/usage.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/images/logo.png nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/README.md nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/server.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/index.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/LICENSE nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/crypto.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/browser.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/utils.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/client.js ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [-]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 5 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed [-]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.1.29 starting... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux disabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Mock Version: 1.1.29 INFO: Mock Version: 1.1.29 Start: lock buildroot INFO: installing package(s): /home/tom/948669-nodejs-hawk/results/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # ['/usr/bin/yum', '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/compton-rawhide-x86_64/root/', 'install', '/home/tom/948669-nodejs-hawk/results/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm'] Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(sntp) < 0.2 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(sntp) >= 0.1 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(boom) >= 0.3 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(hoek) < 0.8 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(boom) < 0.4 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(cryptiles) >= 0.1 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(hoek) >= 0.7 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: nodejs(engine) < 0.9 Installed: nodejs-0.10.0-3.fc20.x86_64 (@fedora) nodejs(engine) = 0.10.0 Available: nodejs-0.10.3-2.fc20.x86_64 (fedora) nodejs(engine) = 0.10.3 Error: Package: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch (/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch) Requires: npm(cryptiles) < 0.2 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2.0-1 ['0.11.1-1.fc20', '0.11.1-1'] nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/uri.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/images/hawk.png nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/index.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/sntp /usr/lib/node_modules/sntp nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/package.json nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/boom /usr/lib/node_modules/boom nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/example/usage.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/images/logo.png nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/README.md nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/server.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/index.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1/LICENSE nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/crypto.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/browser.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/cryptiles /usr/lib/node_modules/cryptiles nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/hoek /usr/lib/node_modules/hoek nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/utils.js nodejs-hawk.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/lib/client.js 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 12 warnings. Requires -------- nodejs-hawk (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) npm(boom) npm(cryptiles) npm(hoek) npm(sntp) Provides -------- nodejs-hawk: nodejs-hawk npm(hawk) MD5-sum check ------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/hawk/-/hawk-0.11.1.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8f71dd2beaf5f93042897c32b7868d7a4cb4fbe1f4602252ddcbd4b9b76e9c1a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8f71dd2beaf5f93042897c32b7868d7a4cb4fbe1f4602252ddcbd4b9b76e9c1a Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: compton-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m compton-rawhide-x86_64 -b 948669
Thanks for the review! Sorry about missing the deps. They're all now blocking this bug. I also fixed the rpmlint warnings: Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk-0.11.1-2.fc18.src.rpm rpmlint (all false positive now): nodejs-hawk.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/sntp /usr/lib/node_modules/sntp nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/boom /usr/lib/node_modules/boom nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/cryptiles /usr/lib/node_modules/cryptiles nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/hoek /usr/lib/node_modules/hoek 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
The updated src.rpm seems to be missing?
It's there now. Sorry about that.
There is a 0.12.1 out now...
Bumped. Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk.spec SRPM: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/npm/nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Key: [x] = Pass [!] = Fail [-] = Not applicable [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= Looks good now. Package approved. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [-]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 5 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot: present but not needed [-]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: %clean present but not required [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc20.noarch.rpm nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/sntp /usr/lib/node_modules/sntp nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/boom /usr/lib/node_modules/boom nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/cryptiles /usr/lib/node_modules/cryptiles nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/hoek /usr/lib/node_modules/hoek 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint nodejs-hawk nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/sntp /usr/lib/node_modules/sntp nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/boom /usr/lib/node_modules/boom nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/cryptiles /usr/lib/node_modules/cryptiles nodejs-hawk.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/lib/node_modules/hawk/node_modules/hoek /usr/lib/node_modules/hoek 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- nodejs-hawk (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): nodejs(engine) npm(boom) npm(cryptiles) npm(hoek) npm(sntp) Provides -------- nodejs-hawk: nodejs-hawk npm(hawk) MD5-sum check ------------- http://registry.npmjs.org/hawk/-/hawk-0.12.1.tgz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : f7d2f354f5f5ed1b61a99ad0faf4f2e98e214e2c2fe9c174ca22fc46dfdee9be CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : f7d2f354f5f5ed1b61a99ad0faf4f2e98e214e2c2fe9c174ca22fc46dfdee9be Generated by fedora-review 0.4.0 (660ce56) last change: 2013-01-29 Buildroot used: compton-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m compton-rawhide-x86_64 -b 948669
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: nodejs-hawk Short Description: HTTP Hawk authentication scheme Owners: patches Branches: f19 f18 el6 InitialCC:
Git done (by process-git-requests).
nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19, nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19, nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19, nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19, node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19, npm-1.2.17-1.fc19, nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19, nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19, nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19, nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4914/nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19,nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19,nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19,node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19,npm-1.2.17-1.fc19,nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19,nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19,nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19,nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19,nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19
nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc18, nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc18, nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc18, nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc18, node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc18, npm-1.2.17-1.fc18, nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc18, nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc18, nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc18, nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc18, nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-5154/nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc18,nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc18,nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc18,node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc18,npm-1.2.17-1.fc18,nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc18,nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc18,nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc18,nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc18,nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc18,nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc18
Package nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19, nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19, nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19, nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19, node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19, npm-1.2.17-1.fc19, nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19, nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19, nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19, nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19, nodejs-boom-0.4.0-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19 nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19 nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19 nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19 node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19 npm-1.2.17-1.fc19 nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19 nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19 nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19 nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19 nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19 nodejs-boom-0.4.0-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-4914/nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19,nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19,nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19,node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19,npm-1.2.17-1.fc19,nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19,nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19,nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19,nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19,nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19,nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19,nodejs-boom-0.4.0-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
nodejs-json-stringify-safe-4.0.0-2.fc19, nodejs-aws-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-oauth-sign-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-tunnel-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, npm-1.2.17-5.fc19, nodejs-tobi-cookie-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-npm-registry-client-0.2.20-1.fc19, nodejs-tar-0.1.17-1.fc19, nodejs-lru-cache-2.3.0-1.fc19, node-gyp-0.9.5-1.fc19, nodejs-forever-agent-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-cryptiles-0.2.0-1.fc19, nodejs-hoek-0.8.1-1.fc19, nodejs-sntp-0.2.1-1.fc19, nodejs-hawk-0.12.1-1.fc19, nodejs-request-2.16.6-2.fc19, nodejs-boom-0.4.0-1.fc19, nodejs-read-package-json-0.3.0-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.