Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
SPEC: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-v4l2.spec SRPM: http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-v4l2-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm DESCRIPTION: A Python binding for the v4l2 (video4linux2) userspace api, using ctypes. RPMLINT: $ rpmlint -i python-v4l2.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ rpmlint -i python-v4l2-0.2-1.fc17.src.rpm python-v4l2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US userspace -> user space, user-space, users pace The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-v4l2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US api -> pi, ape, apt The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-v4l2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ctypes -> types, c types The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-v4l2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US linux -> Linux The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. Regards!
Oops... wrong component. Please assign this to Review-Request (fedora-review is a tool used when reviewing). See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
Just some quick comments: - The license is wrong...it's GPLv2+, see v4l2.py 'or (at your option) any later version.'. - The website says :"Currently the bindings are up to date with the 2.6.34 kernel headers.". The current kernel in F18 is 3.8.8. Does this play nice? - Why do you need 'Provides:'? BTW, this is the template for package reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=fedora-review
I need this for a current project - I change the licences to GPLv2+ SPEC http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-v4l2.spec SRPM http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-v4l2-0.2-2.fc17.src.rpm Best Regards!
when I have the new versions, I create new BZ! Best Regards!