Bug 949859 - ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
Summary: ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 895225
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: yum
Version: rawhide
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Packaging Maintenance Team
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-04-09 07:50 UTC by german
Modified: 2013-04-09 07:55 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-09 07:55:22 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description german 2013-04-09 07:50:55 UTC
Description of problem: After running 'sudo yum update --skip-broken' I get the message: Running Transaction Check
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
texlive-texlive-common-doc is obsoleted by (installed) tex-texlive-common-doc-1:svn26673-1.noarch
texlive-texlive-en-doc is obsoleted by (installed) tex-texlive-en-doc-1:svn26703-1.noarch
Please report this error in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=rawhide&component=yum
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Your transaction was saved, rerun it with:
 yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx.2013-04-09.09-16.8Oraru.yumtx

Running 'sudo rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest" didn't work, also 'sudo yum load-transaction /tmp/yum_save_tx.2013-04-09.09-16.8Oraru.yumtx'


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 
yum --version
3.4.3
  Installed: rpm-4.9.1.3-7.fc17.x86_64 at 2012-06-08 18:28
  Built    : Fedora Project at 2012-05-07 10:05
  Committed: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> at 2012-05-07

  Installed: yum-3.4.3-30.fc17.noarch at 2012-11-22 17:26
  Built    : Fedora Project at 2012-11-12 14:39
  Committed: Zdenek Pavlas <zpavlas at redhat.com> at 2012-11-12



How reproducible: Each time I rum 'sudo yum update --skip-broken'


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Zeleny 2013-04-09 07:55:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 895225 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.