RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 950122 - Missing description of -batch in man page of tc command
Summary: Missing description of -batch in man page of tc command
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: iproute
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Petr Šabata
QA Contact: David Spurek
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-04-09 17:03 UTC by Hubert Kario
Modified: 2015-03-02 05:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: iproute-2.6.32-24.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: The tc utility documentation was lacking description of the batch option. Consequence: Poor documentation leads to user frustration. Fix: The description of the -batch option was added to the manpage. Result: General documentation improvements.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 23:04:48 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
add short description of batch mode in tc man page (1.24 KB, patch)
2013-04-11 14:52 UTC, Hubert Kario
no flags Details | Diff


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1697 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE iproute bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-21 00:39:29 UTC

Description Hubert Kario 2013-04-09 17:03:14 UTC
Description of problem:
Man page of tc doesn't describe usage of -batch option while output from 'tc -help' does mention it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
iproute-2.6.32-23.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. man tc
2. search for batch
3.
  
Actual results:
No description found

Expected results:
Description on how it's used, what are the possible inputs, etc.

Additional info:
The bug is present in Fedora 18 too, so it's quite likely not fixed upstream and present in all distributions.

Comment 1 Hubert Kario 2013-04-11 14:52:58 UTC
Created attachment 734273 [details]
add short description of batch mode in tc man page

I've prepared a simple patch of the man page to add short description of -batch and -force switches.

The patch was also sent to iproute2 mailing list and man page maintainer.

Comment 2 Petr Šabata 2013-04-24 09:16:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> The patch was also sent to iproute2 mailing list and man page maintainer.

Patch is upstream (ce93fff).

Thanks, Hubert.
Requesting acks.

Comment 8 Petr Šabata 2013-08-13 16:18:46 UTC
Pushed as iproute-2.6.32-24.el6.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 23:04:48 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1697.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.