Bug 951 - Configuration files aren't always included in the RPMs
Summary: Configuration files aren't always included in the RPMs
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-release   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 5.2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lawrence
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 1999-01-24 21:48 UTC by Ziv, Alon
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 1999-03-11 19:03:34 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Ziv, Alon 1999-01-24 21:48:08 UTC 
In most cases, if a package is shipped without a default
configuration file, this file isn't listed at all in the RPM
(not even as a %ghost).

Fix:
Include optional configuration files in the RPMS as %config
%ghost.  For example, /etc/ld.so.conf should be included in
glibc; /etc/modules.conf should be listed in modutils;
/etc/rpmrc should be listed in rpm.
Comment 1 David Lawrence 1999-03-11 19:03:59 UTC 
Change you for your suggestion. It has been noted and will be
considered for future releases of RPM.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.