Bug 951018
| Summary: | Don't fail when a non-existing bond is requested via setupNetworks. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Antoni Segura Puimedon <asegurap> |
| Component: | vdsm | Assignee: | Antoni Segura Puimedon <asegurap> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Meni Yakove <myakove> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.1.3 | CC: | abaron, alkaplan, atal, bazulay, danken, hateya, iheim, jocarter, lpeer, lvernia, mkenneth, Rhev-m-bugs, sgrinber, yeylon, ykaul, zdover |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | CodeChange, ZStream |
| Target Release: | 3.1.4 | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Windows | ||
| Whiteboard: | network | ||
| Fixed In Version: | vdsm-4.10.2-1.11.el6ev | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Previously, when setupNetworks referred to a non-existing bond, setupNetworks failed to validate bond options, returning "error parsing bonding options mode=4".
This was because previously existing bond device options were confirmed to exist by a check determining whether sysfs exposed them. In this case, if the request bond did not exist during the check, the error message displayed and the bond options failed to validate.
A patch to VDSM now ensures that when setupNetworks requests a bond that doesn't exist, bond option validation does not fail.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | 918666 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2013-05-01 18:25:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Network | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 649239, 918666 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 647155, 649241 | ||
|
Comment 4
Meni Yakove
2013-04-28 07:15:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0774.html |