RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 951118 - Prefer-plain suppresses its own HTML attachments recursively
Summary: Prefer-plain suppresses its own HTML attachments recursively
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: evolution
Version: 6.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Matthew Barnes
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-04-11 13:56 UTC by David Jaša
Modified: 2014-01-02 10:59 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: evolution-2.32.3-2.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 05:12:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
example message (22.63 KB, text/plain)
2013-04-11 13:56 UTC, David Jaša 		no flags Details
video of the behaviour (7.13 MB, video/mp4)
2013-04-11 14:05 UTC, David Jaša 		no flags Details
evolution-2.28.3-suppress-part.patch (1.11 KB, patch)
2013-04-15 11:08 UTC, Milan Crha 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2013:1540 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Low: evolution security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2013-11-21 00:40:51 UTC

Description David Jaša 2013-04-11 13:56:47 UTC 
Created attachment 734212 [details]
example message

Description of problem:
evo can't open some html bodies with "Could not load attachment.html / A load operation is already in progress" error

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
evolution-2.28.3-30.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:
always with given message

Steps to Reproduce:
1. set up mail reading options to prefer plain text
2. open the message
3. click the arrow to display the html part inline
  
Actual results:
1. an error pops up saying:
<b>Could not load attachment.html</b>
A load operation is already in progress
2. evolution prints to the console:
(evolution:22124): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_cell_view_set_displayed_row: assertion `GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (cell_view->priv->model)' failed

(evolution:22124): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_cell_view_set_displayed_row: assertion `GTK_IS_TREE_MODEL (cell_view->priv->model)' failed

(evolution:22124): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_cell_view_set_cell_data: assertion `cell_view->priv->displayed_row != NULL' failed

(evolution:22124): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_cell_view_set_cell_data: assertion `cell_view->priv->displayed_row != NULL' failed

3. second "attachment" of "unknown attachment (attachment.html)" appears
4. after the dialog is dismissed, evo prints:
(evolution:22124): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed


Expected results:
html attachment is displayed normally

Additional info:
I didn't update the computer for few weeks and this used to work normally up until few days ago. The only thing that has changed is that I added s/mime certs to the account.
Comment 1 David Jaša 2013-04-11 14:05:36 UTC 
Created attachment 734216 [details]
video of the behaviour
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2013-04-11 17:09:58 UTC 
Thanks for a bug report. The only related change which I did recently was within bug #949610. Do you have that backported patch applied or not? Since your above comment sounds like not, will anything change if you'll apply it?
Comment 3 David Jaša 2013-04-12 07:15:47 UTC 
No, I'm still stuck with 6.4 GA version.
Comment 4 David Jaša 2013-04-12 07:16:18 UTC 
(In reply to comment #0)
> Additional info:
> I didn't update the computer for few weeks and this used to work normally up
> until few days ago. The only thing that has changed is that I added s/mime
> certs to the account.
Comment 5 Milan Crha 2013-04-15 11:05:49 UTC 
OK, thanks. I just wanted to make sure. After some testing, the prefer-plain plugin causes this, the "Only ever show plain" option.
Comment 6 Milan Crha 2013-04-15 11:08:17 UTC 
Created attachment 735867 [details]
evolution-2.28.3-suppress-part.patch

for evolution;

Patch to fix the issue. The prefer-plain suppresses also alone HTML parts, not only those in a multipart/alternative, and here it was applied twice, on the itself-generated attachment, which is wrong.
Comment 8 Milan Crha 2013-06-10 13:16:58 UTC 
The patch is obsolete by the rebase, 2.32.3 has something similar already included.
Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 05:12:38 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1540.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.