RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 951743 - (usermod -U) can't undo (passwd -l)
Summary: (usermod -U) can't undo (passwd -l)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: shadow-utils
Version: 6.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Tomas Mraz
QA Contact: Patrik Kis
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1148008 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-04-12 23:55 UTC by Miloslav Trmač
Modified: 2016-05-10 23:59 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: shadow-utils-4.1.5.1-2.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-10 23:59:47 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1185425 0 high CLOSED RHEL7 - shadow-utils: usermod account lock/unlock behavior differs on passwd lock/unlock 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2016:0864 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE shadow-utils bug fix update 2016-05-10 22:46:39 UTC

Internal Links: 1185425

Description Miloslav Trmač 2013-04-12 23:55:05 UTC
Description of problem:
Libuser (called passwd) is currently using "!!" to lock passwords, not "!" as usermod expects.  So $summary.

While libuser might be changed, usermod should be modified to handle "!!" (or preferably? do what libuser does in modules/files.c:lock_process) so that passwords previously locked through passwd can be unlocked.

See #853153 for more information.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2013-10-13 23:42:16 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 Miloslav Trmač 2014-09-30 14:21:11 UTC
*** Bug 1148008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 David Lewis 2015-12-01 17:13:40 UTC
This issue is found in RHEL 7 as well.

Comment 8 Tomas Mraz 2015-12-02 08:46:36 UTC
Yes, that's bug 1185425

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-05-10 23:59:47 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-0864.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.