Bug 956204 - Review Request: bdii-config-site - site BDII configuration files
Summary: Review Request: bdii-config-site - site BDII configuration files
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-NEEDSPONSOR
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-04-24 13:02 UTC by maria.alandes.pradillo
Modified: 2017-05-31 09:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-05-31 09:17:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description maria.alandes.pradillo 2013-04-24 13:02:05 UTC
Spec URL: https://malandes.web.cern.ch/malandes/spec/bdii-config-site.spec
SRPM URL: https://malandes.web.cern.ch/malandes/slc6/bdii-config-site-1.0.7-1.el6.src.rpm
Description: 

Hi,

I would like to release the bdii-config-site package for the first time in EPEL. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. 

bdii-config-site contains the configuration files for the Site BDII. The core package, bdii, is already part of EPEL and I would like to release now all the remaining ones that comprise all together a site or top BDII.

I have tested the build works fine in koji, please check:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5296198

Fedora Account System Username: malandes

Comment 1 Steve Traylen 2013-04-24 14:47:03 UTC
Hi Maria, 

A few things that immediately notice,

The .spec file 
Source:		%{name}-%{version}.src.tgz
the origin is not specified. See 

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL

I see you have submitted a number of packages for review which depend
on one another.
Could you in bugzilla block (depeds on) the bugzilla entries so the order is obvious.

Comment 2 maria.alandes.pradillo 2013-04-24 15:02:25 UTC
Dear Steve,

OK, thanks for noticing this. I thought I had followed all the guidelines. I will doublecheck that again.

All the packages that I am trying to release here are in fact independent.

Comment 4 Steve Traylen 2017-05-31 09:17:36 UTC
So old - never going to happen.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.