Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 product line. The current stable release is 5.10. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 959217

Summary: SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/sssd/krb5_child from name_connect access on the tcp_socket
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Michal Trunecka <mtruneck>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Miroslav Grepl <mgrepl>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Milos Malik <mmalik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.9CC: dwalsh, ebenes, eparis, jhrozek, kbanerje, mmalik, rmainz, tlavigne
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-2.4.6-347.el5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 889251 Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-16 00:29:43 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 889251    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2014-01-22 16:31:28 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for
potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently
deployed products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in
a release.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2014-09-16 00:29:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1205.html