Bug 960568 - snmp-bridge-mib includes ifindex by the bridge it self
snmp-bridge-mib includes ifindex by the bridge it self
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: net-snmp (Show other bugs)
6.4
Unspecified Unspecified
medium Severity medium
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Jan Safranek
Dalibor Pospíšil
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-05-07 08:03 EDT by Dalibor Pospíšil
Modified: 2013-11-21 17:50 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: net-snmp-5.5-45.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
In previous releases, snmp-bridge-mib subagent included the bridge itself as a port of the bridge in BRIDGE-MIB::dot1dBasePortTable. This is wrong and it has been fixed in this update, where snmp-bridge-mib subagent reports only real interfaces as ports in the BRIDGE-MIB::dot1dBasePortTable.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 17:50:28 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Dalibor Pospíšil 2013-05-07 08:03:18 EDT
Description of problem:
snmp-bridge-mib includes ifindex by the bridge it self.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.5-44.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. execute linked test
  
Actual results:
snmpwalk returns interfaces attached to the bridge + brigde it self

Expected results:
snmpwalk returns interfaces attached to the bridge


Additional info:
This behavior does not appear in net-snmp-5.7.2 which is correct according to developer.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 17:50:28 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1693.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.