Bug 961032 – [sanlock] wdmd should select correct watchdog device

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 961032 - [sanlock] wdmd should select correct watchdog device

Summary:	[sanlock] wdmd should select correct watchdog device

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	sanlock (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	6.4
Hardware:	Unspecified Unspecified

Priority	unspecified Severity unspecified
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	David Teigland
QA Contact:	Leonid Natapov
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-05-08 11:06 EDT by David Teigland
Modified:	2013-11-21 06:49 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	sanlock-2.8-1
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-11-21 06:49:04 EST
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata	RHBA-2013:1632	normal	SHIPPED_LIVE	sanlock bug fix and enhancement update	2013-11-20 20:32:25 EST

Groups: None (edit)

Description David Teigland 2013-05-08 11:06:41 EDT

Description of problem:

On some systems, multiple watchdog devices appear, some functional and some not.
wdmd needs to select the one that works.

See Fedora bug 878119

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 David Teigland 2013-06-26 12:32:19 EDT

For more information about testing this, see fedora bug 878119.
You need watchdog hardware that exposes both /dev/watchdog0 and
/dev/watchdog1, where watchdog0 is not fully functional.

Comment 4 Leonid Natapov 2013-08-26 09:05:36 EDT

(In reply to David Teigland from comment #1)
> For more information about testing this, see fedora bug 878119.
> You need watchdog hardware that exposes both /dev/watchdog0 and
> /dev/watchdog1, where watchdog0 is not fully functional.

David,can we test it without watchdog hardware ?

Comment 5 David Teigland 2013-08-26 10:47:12 EDT

I would just ensure there are no regressions in the existing tests.
It may not be feasible to find and test with hardware that exposts
the dual watchdogs.

Comment 6 Leonid Natapov 2013-08-27 09:07:46 EDT

sanlock-2.8-1.el6.x86_64. No regressions were found.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 06:49:04 EST

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1632.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.