Bug 961048 - Review Request: codemod - A tool to assist with large codebase refactors
Summary: Review Request: codemod - A tool to assist with large codebase refactors
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ralph Bean
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-08 15:48 UTC by Rick Elrod
Modified: 2013-05-24 19:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.el6
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-19 02:35:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
rbean: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rick Elrod 2013-05-08 15:48:23 UTC
Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/codemod/codemod.spec
SRPM URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/codemod/codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc19.src.rpm
Description:
Codemod is a tool/library to assist you with large-scale code base
refactors that can be partially automated but still require human
oversight and occasional intervention.

Fedora Account System Username: codeblock

Comment 1 Ralph Bean 2013-05-08 16:25:22 UTC
Package is APPROVED.

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Apache (v2.0)". Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/threebean/961048-codemod/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
     Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc18.noarch.rpm
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) refactors -> redactors, reactors, re factors
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refactors -> redactors, reactors, re factors
codemod.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary codemod
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint codemod
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) refactors -> redactors, reactors, re factors
codemod.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US refactors -> redactors, reactors, re factors
codemod.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary codemod
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
codemod (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/env
    python



Provides
--------
codemod:
    codemod



Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-18-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 961048


Package is APPROVED.

Comment 2 Rick Elrod 2013-05-08 16:35:44 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: codemod
Short Description: A tool to assist with large codebase refactors
Owners: codeblock
Branches: el6 f18 f19
InitialCC:

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-05-08 17:07:10 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2013-05-08 17:42:50 UTC
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc18

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2013-05-08 17:43:39 UTC
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.el6

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-05-09 09:58:41 UTC
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2013-05-19 02:35:30 UTC
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-05-24 19:07:49 UTC
codemod-1.0-1.20130508giteac2165.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.