Bug 961446 - Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
Summary: Review Request: c2esp - CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fridolín Pokorný
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: RejectedFreezeException
Depends On:
Blocks: 959703
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-09 16:08 UTC by Jiri Popelka
Modified: 2013-07-04 08:17 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: c2esp-2.6-1.fc19
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-05 03:22:13 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
fpokorny: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jiri Popelka 2013-05-09 16:08:55 UTC
Spec URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/c2esp.spec
SRPM URL: http://jpopelka.fedorapeople.org/c2esp-2.6-1.fc19.src.rpm

Description: This package contains CUPS filters and drivers for Kodak ESP and Hero all in one printers, see also bug #959703.

Fedora Account System Username: jpopelka

Comment 1 Fedora Blocker Bugs Application 2013-05-16 06:23:47 UTC
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 19-beta by Fedora user quickbooks using the blocker tracking app because:

 cannot print

Comment 2 Adam Williamson 2013-05-20 18:24:22 UTC
Discussed at 2013-05-20 freeze exception review meeting: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-05-20/f19beta-blocker-review-7.2013-05-20-16.07.log.txt . Rejected as a freeze exception issue: in the first place it doesn't appear likely this is going to be reviewed and accepted in time for inclusion, in the second place this can be fixed well enough with an update, there's no need to break freeze just to improve printing support.

Comment 3 Fridolín Pokorný 2013-05-22 09:15:21 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
     Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     961446-c2esp/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
     Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Uses parallel make.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: c2esp-2.6-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm
c2esp.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/c2esp-2.6/COPYING
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint c2esp
c2esp.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/c2esp-2.6/COPYING
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
c2esp (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    cups-filesystem
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcom_err.so.2()(64bit)
    libcrypt.so.1()(64bit)
    libcups.so.2()(64bit)
    libcupsfilters.so.1()(64bit)
    libcupsimage.so.2()(64bit)
    libgssapi_krb5.so.2()(64bit)
    libjbig85.so.2.0()(64bit)
    libk5crypto.so.3()(64bit)
    libkrb5.so.3()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libz.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
c2esp:
    c2esp
    c2esp(x86-64)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_5100_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_5300_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_5500_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp-3_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_3200_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_5200_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_5_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_7200_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_7_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_9200_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_9_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_c110_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_c310_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_office_4100_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_esp_office_6100_series_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_hero_3.1_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_hero_5.1_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_hero_6.1_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_hero_7.1_aio;)
    postscriptdriver(eastman_kodak_company;kodak_hero_9.1_aio;)



Source checksums
----------------
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cupsdriverkodak/c2esp26.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 9c1427ca9a7374b2dc052953084f5c1a3675ec6842ea77b8e2ae86fa3bfa5856
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9c1427ca9a7374b2dc052953084f5c1a3675ec6842ea77b8e2ae86fa3bfa5856


Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29
Buildroot used: fedora-19-x86_64
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-19-x86_64 -b 961446

Looks fine to me, minor issues bellow:

1. [!] Uses parallel make.

As written in the specfile, Makefile is not ready for %%{?_smp_mflags} (config.h
is a shared resource). This error message is not significant.

2. Rpmlint error is harmless and can be ignored.

3. License missing in some source files:
 * c2esp26/c2esp.c
 * c2esp26/c2espC.c
 * c2esp26/c2espcommon.c
 * c2esp26/command2esp.c

Comment 4 Fridolín Pokorný 2013-05-22 10:30:54 UTC
Manual review was done, all manual review passes should be marked as "[x]"
(passed). Sorry for that.

Comment 5 Fridolín Pokorný 2013-05-23 11:04:59 UTC
No blocker identified, package is accepted.

Comment 6 Jiri Popelka 2013-05-23 12:09:21 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: c2esp
Short Description: CUPS driver for Kodak AiO printers
Owners: jpopelka
Branches: f19

Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2013-05-23 12:56:19 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2013-05-23 13:44:53 UTC
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/c2esp-2.6-1.fc19

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2013-05-23 19:59:01 UTC
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2013-06-05 03:22:13 UTC
c2esp-2.6-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.