Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 964184

Summary: Examples required in Running PackStack Interactively - if one does not accept the defaults, do we need to provide examples of responses?
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Bruce Reeler <breeler>
Component: doc-Getting_Started_GuideAssignee: RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 3.0CC: adahms, mlopes, sgordon, slong
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: 5.0 (RHEL 7)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-02-03 08:31:00 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bruce Reeler 2013-05-17 12:47:29 UTC
Description of problem:
Examples required in Running PackStack Interactively  - step 12g: A public interface must be configured to allow... Enter the name of the public interface to use.
as well as step 12h for the private interface.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.0


Expected results:
Examples of names of interfaces.

Comment 2 Bruce Reeler 2013-06-06 02:17:54 UTC
Generalizing this bug, though not sure if we need to provide this level of detail in GSG:
If users are not just accepting default values to PackStack's prompts, do we need to (and can we?) provide alternative examples? E.g. in comment 0 in this bug, what format does an alternative interface take, is it just for example eth2 or are there other formats?

Comment 3 Stephen Gordon 2013-06-12 14:59:07 UTC
(In reply to Bruce Reeler from comment #2)
> Generalizing this bug, though not sure if we need to provide this level of
> detail in GSG:
> If users are not just accepting default values to PackStack's prompts, do we
> need to (and can we?) provide alternative examples? E.g. in comment 0 in
> this bug, what format does an alternative interface take, is it just for
> example eth2 or are there other formats?

Common formats for the interfaces include:

ethX - eth0, eth1, eth2
emX - em1, em1, em2
pXpy - p1p1, p1p2, p2p1, p2p2

For the Open vSwitch bridges expect values like:

br-int - Internal bridge
br-ex - External bridge

For the Linux Bridge bridges expect values like:

br1
br100

Comment 4 Stephen Gordon 2013-06-20 19:33:59 UTC
Moved to 4.0.

Comment 5 Bruce Reeler 2014-04-10 06:05:14 UTC
Added interface examples to step 14k (or 14.11) of Configuring the Compute service.
Added br-ex as an example in step 15d (or 15.4) of Configuring OpenStack Networking.
Added linuxbridge names to step 15f (or 15.6) of Configuring OpenStack Networking.

Comment 13 Andrew Dahms 2015-02-03 08:31:00 UTC
Examples of how to use Packstack have been incorporated into the Getting Started Guide, and the guide itself is under a full review.

Closing.