Bug 965136 – chcat doesn't add category, just replaces it

Bug 965136 - chcat doesn't add category, just replaces it

Summary:	chcat doesn't add category, just replaces it

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:	Red Hat
Component:	policycoreutils (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	5.9
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	unspecified Severity medium
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Daniel Walsh
QA Contact:	BaseOS QE Security Team
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2013-05-20 09:42 EDT by Michal Trunecka
Modified:	2014-09-30 19:34 EDT (History)
CC List:	4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2013-05-23 11:00:59 EDT
Type:	Bug
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Michal Trunecka 2013-05-20 09:42:36 EDT

Description of problem:

# useradd testuser
# chcat -l -L testuser
testuser: s0
# chcat -l s0:c0 testuser
# chcat -l -L testuser
testuser: s0:c0
# chcat -l +s0:c1 testuser
# chcat -l -L testuser
testuser: s0:c1


Expected result:
# chcat -l -L testuser
testuser: s0:c0,c1


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
policycoreutils-1.33.12-14.11.el5

How reproducible:
always

Comment 1 RHEL Product and Program Management 2013-05-20 12:42:01 EDT

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion
in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product Management has
requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for
potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently
deployed products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in
a release.

Comment 2 Michal Trunecka 2013-05-21 02:55:48 EDT

I have played with it a bit and it seems like c0 is not a standard category on RHEL5, but means something like "no category", right? And that is why it doesn't show c0,c1 but only c1, is that correct? But it is different from RHEL6 and RHEL7 then.

Comment 4 Daniel Walsh 2013-05-23 10:44:12 EDT

c0 is not standard, s0 is the default s0:c0 would be category c0.

Comment 5 RHEL Product and Program Management 2013-05-23 11:00:59 EDT

Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.
You may appeal this decision by reopening this request.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.