This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-09-28. It is expected to last about 1 hours
Bug 965835 - Review Request: mingw-protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
Review Request: mingw-protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
All Linux
unspecified Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2013-05-21 16:10 EDT by Steve
Modified: 2015-07-21 08:30 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2015-01-09 16:00:31 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steve 2013-05-21 16:10:30 EDT
Spec URL:
Description: This is the MinGW version of protobuf, already available as a standard Fedora package.  It's based on the existing protobuf package, and fedora-review found no significant issues, so hopefully approving this package isn't much effort.
Also, hopefully, submitting this package for review isn't considered "spam" -- that's certainly not my intent.
I would like to submit all of the dependencies of the MS Windows version of Mixxx (see for more info), and there are about 12.  The new version of mixxx (1.11.0) has finally been approved on RPMFusion.
Fedora Account System Username: ulatekh
Comment 1 Veaceslav Mindru 2013-07-30 04:15:14 EDT
Hello Steve,

Please remove rm -rf under %install.

>rm -rf %{buildroot} 

Following E/W are reported by rpmlint.  

mingw-protobuf.spec:295: W: macro-in-comment %doc
mingw-protobuf.spec:315: W: macro-in-comment %doc
mingw-protobuf.spec:321: W: macro-in-comment %doc
mingw-protobuf.spec:327: W: macro-in-comment %doc
mingw-protobuf.spec:26: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 16, tab: line 26)
Comment 2 Pavol Rusnak 2014-08-03 18:35:47 EDT
I updated the package to follow the latest protobuf (2.5.0):

Spec URL:

Koji build:
Comment 3 František Dvořák 2014-08-16 06:24:30 EDT
It looks like this review is stalled as original submitter haven't responsed for more than a year.

Let's wait one more week according to . After that time this review can be closed. It will be possible to create branch new review request for this package.
Comment 4 Pavol Rusnak 2015-01-09 12:12:31 EST
Comment 5 František Dvořák 2015-01-09 16:00:31 EST
Yes, let's close this one. New review can be submitted, if needed.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.