Bug 969926 - RFE: Per-chapter standardized synopsis format? Food for thought
Summary: RFE: Per-chapter standardized synopsis format? Food for thought
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: PressGang CCMS
Classification: Community
Component: CSProcessor
Version: 1.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-06-03 04:59 UTC by Misty Stanley-Jones
Modified: 2023-02-21 23:20 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Misty Stanley-Jones 2013-06-03 04:59:28 UTC
An idea to put on the back burner for now, but a feature to consider for the CSProcessor maybe? Matt, this is from an ancient RT from 2011.
===================

Thu May 10 15:10:50 2012 Michael Hideo-Smith <mhideo> - Ticket created [Reply] [Comment]
Subject: 	Fwd: Fwd: FreeBSD Handbook
Date: 	Thu, 10 May 2012 15:07:05 +1000
To: 	content-services
From: 	Mike Hideo <mhideo>
Download (untitled) / with headers
text/plain 1.1k


Hide quoted text
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: FreeBSD Handbook
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 23:37:07 -0400 (EDT)
From: Matt Casperson <mcaspers>
To: Mike Hideo <mhideo>



An example of having a standard set of titles after a TOC, instead of
removing them altogether.

Matt

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"David Jorm" <djorm>
*To: *"content-services-list" <content-services-list>
*Sent: *Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:11:25 PM
*Subject: *FreeBSD Handbook

Hi All

I had an interesting chat about docs with an engineer from a Red Hat
customer yesterday. He mentioned that the FreeBSD Handbook is a great
model for technical documentation. I went and took a look and I have to
say I agree:

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ [Open URL]

The #1 take away for me is the synopsis section at the start of every
chapter, with its coverage of pre-reqs and outcomes. Just a thought,
perhaps this kind of synopsis at an aggregated topic group level can be
used within topic maps in the future.

Thanks
-- 
David Jorm / Red Hat Security Response Team


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.