RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 972862 - cppunit fails to detect GCC C++ ABI name demangling support
Summary: cppunit fails to detect GCC C++ ABI name demangling support
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: cppunit
Version: 6.4
Hardware: All
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Dodji Seketeli
QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-06-10 16:36 UTC by Vasil Velichkov
Modified: 2015-12-11 14:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-11 14:39:08 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Debian BTS 650033 0 None None None Never

Description Vasil Velichkov 2013-06-10 16:36:23 UTC 
Description of problem:

cppunit fails to detect GCC C++ ABI name demangling and as a result produce strange class names.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

$ rpm -q cppunit gcc
cppunit-1.12.1-3.1.el6.x86_64
gcc-4.4.7-3.el6.x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. fedpkg clone cppunit --anonymous
2. fedpkg compile 
3. vim cppunit-1.12.1/config.log

Actual results:

configure:21050: checking whether the compiler supports GCC C++ ABI name demangling
configure:21099: g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic  conftest.cpp >&5
conftest.cpp: In function 'int main()':
conftest.cpp:42: error: 'free' was not declared in this scope

$ cat cppunit-1.12.1/config/config.h | grep DEMANGLE
/* #undef HAVE_GCC_ABI_DEMANGLE */

Expected results:

configure:21276: checking whether the compiler supports GCC C++ ABI name demangling 
configure:21326: g++ -c -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic  conftest.cpp >&5 
configure:21333: $? = 0 

$ cat cppunit-1.12.1/config/config.h | grep DEMANGLE
#define HAVE_GCC_ABI_DEMANGLE 1

Additional info:

http://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/bugs/198/

http://sourceforge.net/p/cppunit/bugs/_discuss/thread/314b3edd/874d/attachment/cppunit-1.12.0-add_configure_missing_include.patch

This patch seems to resolve this problem.
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2013-10-13 23:29:20 UTC 
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in the current release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Because the affected component is not scheduled to be updated
in the current release, Red Hat is unable to address this
request at this time.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate, in the next release of
Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 4 Matt Newsome 2015-12-11 14:39:08 UTC 
Thank you for submitting this request for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. We've carefully evaluated the request, but are unable to include it in a future release. To request that Red Hat re-consider this request, please re-open the bugzilla via appropriate support channels and provide additional business and/or technical details about its importance to you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.