RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 973224 - resteasy-base must be split into subpackages to simplify dependencies
Summary: resteasy-base must be split into subpackages to simplify dependencies
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: resteasy-base
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ade Lee
QA Contact: Asha Akkiangady
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-06-11 13:41 UTC by Stanislav Ochotnicky
Modified: 2020-10-04 20:37 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 09:17:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
srpm for phase 1 (2.15 MB, application/x-rpm)
2013-07-03 16:03 UTC, Ade Lee 		no flags Details
new spec file (8.68 KB, text/x-rpm-spec)
2013-07-03 16:05 UTC, Ade Lee 		no flags Details
srpm for phase 2 (2.15 MB, application/x-rpm)
2013-07-09 16:08 UTC, Ade Lee 		no flags Details
new spec file for phase 2 (9.19 KB, text/x-rpm-spec)
2013-07-09 16:09 UTC, Ade Lee 		no flags Details
diff for pki-core spec file (1.92 KB, patch)
2013-07-09 16:22 UTC, Ade Lee 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github dogtagpki pki issues 1218 0 None None None 2020-10-04 20:37:32 UTC

Description Stanislav Ochotnicky 2013-06-11 13:41:58 UTC 
Description of problem:
Currently resteasy-base pulls in following list of java packages:
apache-commons-cli
apache-commons-codec
apache-commons-collections
apache-commons-lang
apache-commons-logging
apache-mime4j >= 0.7.2-2
bea-stax
bouncycastle
bouncycastle-mail
cglib
dnsjava
geronimo-annotation
glassfish-fastinfoset
glassfish-jaxb >= 2.2.5-2
glassfish-jaxb-api
google-guice
httpcomponents-client
httpcomponents-core
httpunit
jackson
jakarta-commons-httpclient
java
javamail
javassist
jboss-servlet-2.5-api
jboss-servlet-3.0-api
jcip-annotations
jettison
jpackage-utils
scannotation
slf4j
snakeyaml
tomcat-el-2.2-api
ws-jaxme
xerces-j2

This dependency chain is *huge* for single package. Resteasy-base contains 28 jar files (half of which are -jandex.jar so I guess we can say 14). That means at least 14 subpackages should be created each with separate set of requires. 

That way pki-server would not pull in whole java stack into base repository/composes

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
resteasy-base-0:2.3.2-11.el7.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -q --requires resteasy-base


Additional info:
Package currently uses old Maven packaging style. By using XMvn/%mvn_build/%mvn_install macro with singleton packaging it would be possible to automatically generate subpackage file listing and requires. Good example is maven-surefire spec file http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/maven-surefire/tree/maven-surefire.spec?h=rhel-7.0 (see lines 138-140)
Comment 2 Ade Lee 2013-07-03 15:58:19 UTC 
We are going to do this in two phases.  In this first phase, I am going to trim down the list of dependencies by reducing the number of modules built to just those used by pki-core, seeing as pki-core is the only project that uses resteasy-base.

This reduces the number of jars considerably to 7 jar files (14 if you count jandex) and drops the Requires list to:

apache-commons-logging
bea-stax
geronimo-annotation
glassfish-jaxb >= 0:2.2.5-2
glassfish-jaxb-api
httpcomponents-client
httpcomponents-core
jackson
jakarta-commons-httpclient
java
javamail
javassist
jboss-servlet-2.5-api
jboss-servlet-3.0-api
jettison
jpackage-utils
scannotation
slf4j
ws-jaxme
xerces-j2

At tis point, I'm not sure its worthwhile splitting into different subpackages, but we will change to use the new build commands nonetheless.
Comment 3 Ade Lee 2013-07-03 16:03:41 UTC 
Created attachment 768323 [details]
srpm for phase 1

srpm for phase 1
Comment 4 Ade Lee 2013-07-03 16:05:28 UTC 
Created attachment 768325 [details]
new spec file
Comment 5 Ade Lee 2013-07-09 16:08:48 UTC 
Created attachment 771103 [details]
srpm for phase 2

With help from msrb, here is a new srpm which uses the new packaging style and splits everything into separate sub packages.
Comment 6 Ade Lee 2013-07-09 16:09:33 UTC 
Created attachment 771104 [details]
new spec file for phase 2
Comment 7 Ade Lee 2013-07-09 16:22:31 UTC 
Created attachment 771110 [details]
diff for pki-core spec file
Comment 8 Ade Lee 2013-07-10 20:18:57 UTC 
Committed as above.
Comment 10 Jenny Severance 2014-01-29 21:56:20 UTC 
# rpm -q resteasy-base
resteasy-base-2.3.5-2.el7.noarch


]# cat /etc/redhat-release 
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 Beta (Maipo)

Is this the expected list??

# rpm -q --requires resteasy-base
resteasy-base-atom-provider = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jackson-provider = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jaxb-provider = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jaxrs = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jaxrs-all = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jaxrs-api = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-jettison-provider = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-providers-pom = 2.3.5-2.el7
resteasy-base-tjws = 2.3.5-2.el7
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Comment 11 Ade Lee 2014-02-26 15:18:14 UTC 
Looks ok to me.  There is also a javadoc rpm, but of course thats not required for runtime.

resteasy-base-javadoc-2.3.5-2.el7.noarch.rpm
Comment 12 Roshni 2014-02-26 15:45:01 UTC 
Verified on resteasy-base-2.3.5-2.el7.noarch
Comment 13 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 09:17:45 UTC 
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.