Bug 977901 - java-service-wrapper: Wrong installation directory
Summary: java-service-wrapper: Wrong installation directory
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: java-service-wrapper
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikolaj Izdebski
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 855780
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-06-25 14:42 UTC by Mikolaj Izdebski
Modified: 2013-06-26 07:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 3.2.5-11
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-06-26 07:59:07 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Proposed patch (1.78 KB, patch)
2013-06-25 14:44 UTC, Mikolaj Izdebski
no flags Details | Diff

Description Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-06-25 14:42:17 UTC
Description of problem:
java-service-wrapper installs its binary JAR file into %{_libdir}/%{name}.  This location is not correct.  According to Java packaging guidelines [1] JAR files using JNI or containing JNI shared objects themselves MUST be placed in %{_jnidir} and CAN BE symlinked to %{_libdir}/%{name}. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.2.5-10

Additional info:
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI

Comment 1 Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-06-25 14:44:33 UTC
Created attachment 765118 [details]
Proposed patch

Comment 3 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2013-06-25 15:17:05 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 4 Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-06-25 15:44:15 UTC
Fixed in java-service-wrapper-3.2.5-11

Comment 5 Mikolaj Izdebski 2013-06-26 07:59:07 UTC
I believe that this bug is fixed in java-service-wrapper-3.2.5-11,
which is available in Fedora Rawhide, so I am closing this bug now.

The build containing the fix can be found at Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=429345


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.