Spec URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont-0.19-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Birdfont is a font editor that creates outline vector graphics and exports fonts in SVG, EOT and TTF format. Fedora Account System Username: cicku
NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont-0.21-1.fc20.src.rpm
> ./configure Add a comment that explains why %configure cannot be used. > Requires: libbirdfont This is the reverse case for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package so apply %_isa in that dependency. Splitting out a library subpackage when there is no API for that library, is a questionable decision, however. It's an unversioned lib even: %{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so > %post -p /sbin/ldconfig > %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Wrong package for those two. > Checking for doit version >= 0.20.0 > [91mNot found[0m Something wrong there for python-doit-0.21.0 in f19.
Yes, there are some problem with doit, in fact this package cannot get PASS in the test. I knew these, but then I found doit has bugs so I just rpmbuild -bs then upload. I will wait.
Hmm.. Let me just fix mistakes here first. NEW SPEC URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont.spec NEW SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/birdfont-0.21-2.fc20.src.rpm
can this be updated to current upstream release 0.30 ? http://birdfont.org/releases/birdfont-0.30.tar.gz
Created attachment 796952 [details] working birdfont.spec After few trial and run, I managed to write a working spec file.
Comment on attachment 796952 [details] working birdfont.spec Please wait. Upstream contacted me with some important info.
upstream released 0.31 tarball
any update?
Hi, Any news here? Thanks.
Sorry for the delay, I've packaged 0.33(now 0.34 is released) but haven't tested yet, I will post the SRPM later(Next week). If you find any bugs please feel free to submit them to upstream but not here :)
Sorry I did not get time to look into new update and also not using this anymore. Therefore leaving this review.
Any update here? Can I take the review?
Go ahead.
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #13) > Any update here? > > Can I take the review? Will update.
Recent version depends on libxmlbird, and its building system is being rewritten, I will wait for a few days.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.