Description of problem: can not mount volume using nfs due to iptable rule not being present on the nodes. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhsc-bb4 node ----- RHS-2.120130619.n.0/2.1/RHS/x86_64/iso/RHS-2.1-20130619.n.0-RHS-x86_64-DVD1.iso http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/noarch/vdsm-cli-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.noarch.rpm http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/noarch/vdsm-gluster-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.noarch.rpm http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/noarch/vdsm-reg-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.noarch.rpm http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/noarch/vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.noarch.rpm http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/x86_64/vdsm-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm http://download.devel.redhat.com/brewroot/packages/vdsm/4.10.2/22.4.el6rhs/x86_64/vdsm-python-4.10.2-22.4.el6rhs.x86_64.rpm client (mounter) -------------- nfs-utils-lib-1.1.5-6.el6.x86_64 nfs-utils-1.2.3-36.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. crate a 3.2 cluster 2. add two nodes to the cluster 3. create a distributed volume with nfs enabled 4. from a rhel client mount the volume mount -t nfs rhsc-bb4-node-h:automation-volume-distribute-nfs-tests -o vers=3 /store/glusterMount/automation-volume-distribute-nfs-tests Actual results: connection times out Expected results: mounts successfully Additional info: workaround: adding port 2049 to be open in iptables allows the volume to be mounted
As per Vijay, We would need the following ports for nfs: 38465 - 38468 and 2049. Need to change the SQL script to add this
Fixed in bb6
Verified in bb6
Kindly verify if the edited doc text is technically correct and sign off.
Looks good
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html