RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 987278 - fail to transfer any data between host and guest with virtio serial through UDP option
Summary: fail to transfer any data between host and guest with virtio serial through U...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Amit Shah
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 985214 1121579 1174102
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-07-23 07:06 UTC by Sibiao Luo
Modified: 2014-12-15 06:52 UTC (History)
15 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 985214
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-26 14:34:47 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Sibiao Luo 2013-07-23 07:09:42 UTC
host info:
3.10.0-0.rc7.64.el7.x86_64
qemu-kvm-1.5.1-2.el7.x86_64
guest info:
3.10.0-0.rc7.64.el7.x86_64

Comment 3 Gerd Hoffmann 2013-11-26 14:34:47 UTC
udp chardev works for me.

Terminal #1:
nc -4 -u -l 12345

Terminal #2: 
qemu-kvm  -chardev udp,id=test,port=12345,localport=54321,ipv4 \
     -device isa-debugcon,iobase=0x402,chardev=test

seabios log messages show up in Terminal #1 just fine.

Now and then there is a piece missing.  But note that unlike TCP the UDP protocol doesn't make any guaranties whatsoever.  In case buffers are full packets are simply dropped and lost.  So this is normal behavior.  Packets can also be reordered.

Note that both qemu+netcat are forced into ipv4 mode to make sure they speak the same protocol.

Also note that I'm explicitly setting localport to avoid a random port being picked.  This allows to keep netcat in terminal #1 running while starting qemu multiple times even though netcat will only accept packets from a single peer address.

Final note: The UDP protocol is stateless.  There is no "connected" and "disconnected" state.  Consequently the UDP chardev backend doesn't send open/close chardev events.  Which virtio-serial might depend on to work correctly.  Amit?

Bottom line:  Testing the udp chardev with anything which requires a reliable stream is bogus in the first place.  The only remotely useful use case for the udp chardev backend I can think of is to send guest output to a remote syslog server (which traditionally listens on udp port 514).

Comment 4 Ronen Hod 2013-11-26 15:05:51 UTC
(In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #3)
> Bottom line:  Testing the udp chardev with anything which requires a
> reliable stream is bogus in the first place.  The only remotely useful use
> case for the udp chardev backend I can think of is to send guest output to a
> remote syslog server (which traditionally listens on udp port 514).

I think that the right test is to validate that data is received. If some/many of the packets are lost, this is OK, as long as many packets are also received.

Comment 5 Amit Shah 2013-11-27 10:03:32 UTC
(In reply to Gerd Hoffmann from comment #3)
> Final note: The UDP protocol is stateless.  There is no "connected" and
> "disconnected" state.  Consequently the UDP chardev backend doesn't send
> open/close chardev events.  Which virtio-serial might depend on to work
> correctly.  Amit?

Yep, good point.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.