Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 98852

Summary:	CAN-2003-0192: mod_ssl renegotiation issue
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Joe Orton <jorton>
Component:	httpd	Assignee:	Joe Orton <jorton>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	9	CC:	dave, mblevis, mitr, mjc
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2003-0192
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2003-09-04 07:40:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Joe Orton 2003-07-09 15:46:20 UTC

Description of problem:
Certain sequences of per-directory renegotiations and the SSLCipherSuite
directive being used to upgrade from a weak ciphersuite to a strong one could
result in the weak ciphersuite being used in place of the strong one.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
all versions of mod_ssl, all versions of httpd before 2.0.47

Comment 1 Mark J. Cox 2003-08-08 16:02:17 UTC

*** Bug 101784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Mark Blevis 2003-08-08 16:12:16 UTC

This bug was opened on July 9 to address a security issue and it remains 
a "NEW" status issue.  When can we expect movement on this so that Redhat 
users and RHN subscribers aren't being encouraged to use outdated and insecure 
software packages?

Comment 3 Mark J. Cox 2003-08-09 17:03:41 UTC

I guess it should really be "assigned" since we did start through our internal
errata process which will lead to an errata.  This issue is classed as a low
priority however as the SSL renegotiation options were for a long time
considered experimental and are rarely used.

Comment 4 Mark J. Cox 2003-09-04 07:40:32 UTC

An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-240.html