Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 988543

Summary: [Doc] [RFE] Glance Registry service deprecation
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Stephen Gordon <sgordon>
Component: doc-Administration_User_GuideAssignee: Summer Long <slong>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.0CC: ddomingo, fpercoco, hateya, slong, yeylon
Target Milestone: z1Keywords: Documentation, FutureFeature
Target Release: 4.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/registry-db-driver
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-09 03:24:19 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 920982, 1049118    

Description Stephen Gordon 2013-07-25 19:33:08 UTC
Cloned for documentation impact, refer to Bug # 920982 for implementation details.

Comment 2 Don Domingo 2013-12-02 23:57:38 UTC
changing the $COMPONENT of this bug accordingly. AFAICT, any possible docs impact of BZ#920982 would be in usage, not installation doco.

Comment 3 Summer Long 2013-12-04 01:52:46 UTC
Ok, looks like glance API v1 is deprecated, and the glance client is using API v2 by default. 

Flavio, could you confirm that because the client uses v2 by default, we don't have to add the following to any glance client commands in the doco?
--os-image-api-version 2

thanks, Summer

Comment 4 Flavio Percoco 2013-12-04 08:20:59 UTC
The API v1 is deprecated and the client support for v2 will be completed during Icehouse. The client - version 0.12 - still uses Glance's API v1. 

Please, notice that not all features of the v2 are supported by the client.

Comment 5 Summer Long 2013-12-04 10:39:24 UTC
So, Flavio, for clarity, although v1 is deprecated, if we can't be sure what v2 supports, we shouldn't force v2 usage via --os-image-api-version 2? 
We should leave client documentation as it now stands and wait for Icehouse to introduce?

Comment 6 Summer Long 2014-01-08 05:35:50 UTC
Sent email reminder to Flavio.

Comment 7 Flavio Percoco 2014-01-08 08:27:41 UTC
Hi Summer, sorry, not sure where that needinfo email end up.

You're right. We shouldn't be forcing `--os-image-api-version 2`, lets wait for the upstream client to do that.

Comment 8 Summer Long 2014-01-09 03:24:19 UTC
Ok, this means that there's nothing additional to add to the docs; closing.