Bug 989142 - VioSCSI device is missing from the hwdata PCI IDS DB, and thus is not shown properly in the output of lspci
VioSCSI device is missing from the hwdata PCI IDS DB, and thus is not shown p...
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: hwdata (Show other bugs)
6.4
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: rc
: ---
Assigned To: Michal Minar
Lukas "krteknet" Novy
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-07-27 16:58 EDT by Lev Veyde
Modified: 2014-02-18 18:56 EST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: hwdata-0.233-8.0.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 06:16:09 EST
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Lev Veyde 2013-07-27 16:58:11 EDT
Description of problem:
The information about RedHat Virtio SCSI device (1af4:1004) is missing from hwdata PCI IDS DB provided with the OS release, and thus no proper info is shown by i.e. lspci utility.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL 6.4
hwdata-0.233-7.9.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run lspci in a VM with VioSCSI device present.
2. note that the device appears as Device 1004, instead of the proper name i.e. "Virtio SCSI"

Actual results:
Device name is not shown properly. Numeric device id is shown instead.

Expected results:
A proper device name should be shown.

Additional info:
The device appears in the updated PCI IDS DB, and as a workaround the updated DB can be manually installed by i.e. update-pciids.
Comment 2 Michal Minar 2013-07-29 01:09:29 EDT
Thanks for this report. As you mentioned, it's already in upstream. No problem pulling it to the new build.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 06:16:09 EST
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1612.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.