Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-pipes.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-pipes-3.3.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: "Coroutines done right". This library generalizes iteratees and coroutines simply and elegantly. Advantages over traditional iteratee/coroutine implementations: * Concise API: Use three simple commands: ('>->'), 'request', and 'respond' * Bidirectionality: Implement duplex channels * Blazing fast: Implementation tuned for speed * Elegant semantics: Use practical category theory * Extension Framework: Mix and match extensions and create your own * ListT: Correct implementation of ListT that interconverts with pipes * Lightweight Dependency: pipes depends only on transformers and mmorph and compiles rapidly * Extensive Documentation: Second to none!
This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5671123
http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/pipes
Update to 4.0.0 release Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-pipes/ghc-pipes.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-pipes/ghc-pipes-4.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5911858
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [-]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 962560 bytes in 32 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-pipes-4.0.0-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm ghc-pipes-devel-4.0.0-1.fc19.x86_64.rpm ghc-pipes-4.0.0-1.fc19.src.rpm ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Compositional -> Com positional, Com-positional, Composition ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US interconverts -> inter converts, inter-converts, interconnects ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0.0-0 ['4.0.0-1.fc19', '4.0.0-1'] ghc-pipes.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Compositional -> Com positional, Com-positional, Composition ghc-pipes.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US interconverts -> inter converts, inter-converts, interconnects 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-pipes ghc-pipes-devel ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Compositional -> Com positional, Com-positional, Composition ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US interconverts -> inter converts, inter-converts, interconnects ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0.0-0 ['4.0.0-1.fc19', '4.0.0-1'] 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-pipes (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.5.1.0-6e4c9bdc36eeb9121f27ccbbcb62e3f3) ghc(mmorph-1.0.0-19cb7e7e7515546730eefb47592cc695) ghc(mtl-2.1.2-02e701f9b1590ee88a0b5b0bd5d93a29) ghc(transformers-0.3.0.0-8e66ecc7d4dae2b07b2b5406908c70e4) ghc(void-0.5.8-c8900b8468055c6fd3782c60be06ebd7) libHSarray-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSbase-4.5.1.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHScontainers-0.4.2.1-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSdeepseq-1.3.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.2.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.4.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSmmorph-1.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSsemigroups-0.8.4.1-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libHSvoid-0.5.8-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ghc-pipes-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(pipes-4.0.0-da4cef87a1f931a5f3ac7509f90dfcb8) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.5.1.0-6e4c9bdc36eeb9121f27ccbbcb62e3f3) ghc-devel(mmorph-1.0.0-19cb7e7e7515546730eefb47592cc695) ghc-devel(mtl-2.1.2-02e701f9b1590ee88a0b5b0bd5d93a29) ghc-devel(transformers-0.3.0.0-8e66ecc7d4dae2b07b2b5406908c70e4) ghc-devel(void-0.5.8-c8900b8468055c6fd3782c60be06ebd7) ghc-pipes(x86-64) Provides -------- ghc-pipes: ghc(pipes-4.0.0-da4cef87a1f931a5f3ac7509f90dfcb8) ghc-pipes ghc-pipes(x86-64) libHSpipes-4.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so()(64bit) ghc-pipes-devel: ghc-devel(pipes-4.0.0-da4cef87a1f931a5f3ac7509f90dfcb8) ghc-pipes-devel ghc-pipes-devel(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-pipes: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.4.2/pipes-4.0.0/libHSpipes-4.0.0-ghc7.4.2.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pipes/4.0.0/pipes-4.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 958aec7db865e21c5443b5a46700a0887c3ee35d91299d36cfd15509d3385f7f CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 958aec7db865e21c5443b5a46700a0887c3ee35d91299d36cfd15509d3385f7f Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 989416 Buildroot used: fedora-19-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG Successful Koji builds for F18, F19, F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6019425 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6019407 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6019415 Issues ------ [!] # rpmlint ghc-pipes ghc-pipes-devel ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0.0-0 ['4.0.0-1.fc19', '4.0.0-1']
(In reply to Shakthi Kannan from comment #4) > [!] # rpmlint ghc-pipes ghc-pipes-devel > ghc-pipes.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.0.0-0 > ['4.0.0-1.fc19', '4.0.0-1'] Good catch - I can fix this when importing I think. ((This was caused by a pre-release of cabal-rpm where I was setting the release field to 0 by default.))
Please update the changelog during import. Package APPROVED.
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-pipes Short Description: Compositional pipelines Owners: petersen Branches: f20 f19 f18 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc19
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc18
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
ghc-pipes-4.0.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.