Harsha, do you think it is critical to have http://review.gluster.org/5681 backported to rhs-2.1 branch by Update1 (need flag 'rhs-2.1.z' for that) Or would it wait for Corbett?
(In reply to Amar Tumballi from comment #5) > Harsha, do you think it is critical to have http://review.gluster.org/5681 > backported to rhs-2.1 branch by Update1 (need flag 'rhs-2.1.z' for that) Or > would it wait for Corbett? I don't see this to be critical, since it wasn't reproduced at customer site. Corbett would be good enough.
https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/13824/
This is working now. Tested in version: glusterfs-3.4.0.53rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64 [root@pythagoras ]# gluster v geo master euclid-380pgen8-05.osas.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com::slave status detail MASTER NODE MASTER VOL MASTER BRICK SLAVE STATUS CHECKPOINT STATUS CRAWL STATUS FILES SYNCD FILES PENDING BYTES PENDING DELETES PENDING FILES SKIPPED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ pythagoras.blr.redhat.com master /rhs/bricks/brick0 euler-380pgen8-05.osas.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com::slave Active N/A Changelog Crawl 16191 0 0 0 0 archimedes.blr.redhat.com master /rhs/bricks/brick3 gauss-380pgen8-05.osas.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com::slave Passive N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 aryabhatta.blr.redhat.com master /rhs/bricks/brick1 euclid-380pgen8-05.osas.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com::slave Passive N/A N/A 0 0 0 0 0 ramanujan.blr.redhat.com master /rhs/bricks/brick2 riemann-380pgen8-05.osas.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com::slave Active N/A Changelog Crawl 16582 0 0 0 0 I used longer fqdn's than the one's used in first comment. And I didn't find any errors in the geo-rep logs. [root@pythagoras ]# egrep "\ E\ " /var/log/glusterfs/geo-replication/master/ssh%3A%2F%2Froot%4010.70.37.188%3Agluster%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1%3Aslave.* [root@pythagoras ]# Moving the bug to verified.
Ah sorry for the noise the change is not this one but - bug 1019522, moving this back to verified
Can you please verify the technical accuracy of the doc text?
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0208.html