Bug 99039 - lifecycle's phase descriptio misleading
lifecycle's phase descriptio misleading
Product: Red Hat Enterprise CMS
Classification: Retired
Component: other (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: ccm-bugs-list
Jon Orris
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2003-07-12 09:52 EDT by Vadim Nasardinov
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:55 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-03 14:25:20 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vadim Nasardinov 2003-07-12 09:52:19 EDT
When you apply the "simple publication" lifecycle to a content
item when publishing it, you are given the option to specify the
end date.  Regardless of whether you specify the end date or not,
the "Lifecycle details" page says something along the lines of

Name         Live
Description  The first phase. It lasts forever.
Start date   Saturday, July 12, 2003 9:45:00 AM EDT
End date     Thursday, January 1, 2004 10:00:00 AM EST

Clearly, if the lifecycle is scheduled to end on January 1, 2004,
it doesn't last forever by the commonly accepted definition of
Comment 1 Vadim Nasardinov 2005-08-03 14:25:20 EDT

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.